StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub vs Perforce

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub vs Perforce

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Perforce
Perforce
Stacks83
Followers113
Votes9
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub vs Perforce: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and Perforce 

GitHub, AWS CodeCommit, and Perforce are popular version control systems that serve different needs for developers. Below are the key differences between these platforms.

1. **Hosting and Pricing**: AWS CodeCommit is integrated with Amazon Web Services (AWS) and provides hosting as part of the AWS ecosystem, making it suitable for organizations already using AWS services. GitHub offers both cloud-based and self-hosted solutions with flexible pricing options, catering to individual developers, startups, and enterprises. Perforce, on the other hand, is known for its enterprise-grade features and custom solutions, which can come at a higher price point. 

2. **Features and Integrations**: GitHub is widely known for its strong community support, extensive integrations with third-party tools, and features such as pull requests, issue tracking, and project boards, making it a preferred choice for open-source projects and collaborative development. AWS CodeCommit integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing for secure and scalable application development, while Perforce is favored for its robust version control capabilities, especially in large-scale projects with complex workflows and requirements.

3. **Scalability and Performance**: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large repositories and support high-velocity development workflows, leveraging the scalability and reliability of AWS infrastructure. GitHub also caters to a large user base and offers efficient performance for code collaboration and version control. Perforce excels in handling massive codebases and binary files with high performance and stability, making it a go-to choice for industries like gaming and automotive that demand stringent version control requirements.

4. **Security and Compliance**: AWS CodeCommit provides secure access control and encryption features, ensuring data protection and compliance with industry standards such as HIPAA and SOC. GitHub offers robust security features like two-factor authentication, vulnerability scanning, and compliance with GDPR regulations, making it suitable for organizations with stringent security requirements. Perforce is known for its enterprise-level security measures, audit trails, and compliance capabilities, making it a preferred choice for industries where data protection and regulatory compliance are paramount.

5. **User Interface and User Experience**: GitHub is renowned for its user-friendly interface, intuitive workflows, and extensive documentation, which appeals to developers of all skill levels. AWS CodeCommit provides a clean and straightforward interface within the AWS Management Console, making it easy to navigate and integrate with other AWS services. Perforce, with its customizable workflows and powerful branching capabilities, caters to advanced users and teams working on complex software projects that require granular control over versioning and branching strategies.

6. **Community and Support**: GitHub boasts a vibrant community of developers, users, and contributors, providing access to a vast array of resources, open-source projects, and collaborative tools. AWS CodeCommit offers comprehensive support from AWS experts and documentation tailored to AWS services integration, while Perforce provides dedicated support services and training programs for enterprises looking to optimize their version control processes.

In Summary, the key differences between AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and Perforce lie in their hosting model and pricing, features and integrations, scalability and performance, security and compliance measures, user interface and user experience, and community and support offerings, catering to a diverse range of development needs and workflows. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Perforce, AWS CodeCommit

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Perforce
Perforce
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise.

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Version Control; Application Lifecycle Management; Static Code Analysis for C, C++, C#, and Java; Codeless Selenium Test Automation; Open Source Support; Enterprise PHP Development
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
83
Stacks
324
Followers
259.0K
Followers
113
Followers
826
Votes
10.4K
Votes
9
Votes
193
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1774
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 3
    Great for Enterprise level use
  • 2
    Robust
  • 1
    Scalable
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    No webhooks
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Git
Git
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Perforce, AWS CodeCommit?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana