Overview

GitHub

Stacks296.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.3K

GitLab

Stacks63.6K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks332

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab

AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab are three popular version control platforms used by developers to manage their code repositories. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart.

Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and offers seamless integration with other AWS services. It allows developers to easily connect their repositories with other AWS tools for deployment, testing, and continuous integration. In contrast, GitHub and GitLab are independent platforms that can integrate with various third-party services.
Pricing Models: AWS CodeCommit has a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the storage used and the number of active users. In contrast, both GitHub and GitLab offer free plans for public repositories, and they charge based on the number of private repositories and users for their paid plans. This makes them more cost-effective for individual developers and small teams.
Access Control and Security: AWS CodeCommit, being an AWS service, leverages AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control. This provides a highly secure and granular level of control over user permissions. GitHub and GitLab also have robust access control mechanisms but offer additional features such as branch protection rules, code review workflows, and security vulnerability scanning.
Deployment Options: AWS CodeCommit is a cloud-based solution provided by AWS, so it runs entirely within the AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, GitHub and GitLab can be self-hosted on-premises or deployed on cloud infrastructure such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the deployment option that best suits their requirements.
Community and Ecosystem: GitHub has the largest user community and is widely used in the open-source community. It offers a vast ecosystem of integrations, plugins, and development tools developed by the community. GitLab also has a substantial community and offers a similar ecosystem but with fewer integrations compared to GitHub. AWS CodeCommit, being an AWS service, has a smaller user community and has fewer third-party integrations available.
Project Management Features: GitHub and GitLab provide comprehensive project management features such as issue tracking, wikis, and project boards, making them suitable for teams working on larger projects. AWS CodeCommit, on the other hand, focuses primarily on source control and does not provide built-in project management functionality.

In summary, AWS CodeCommit offers seamless integration with other AWS services and provides a secure and highly scalable source control solution, while GitHub and GitLab have larger user communities, a wider range of third-party integrations, and robust project management features. The choice between these platforms depends on specific requirements, such as the need for AWS integration, community support, and project management functionalities.

Advice on GitHub, GitLab, AWS CodeCommit

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	GitLab	AWS CodeCommit
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 296.5K	Stacks 63.6K	Stacks 332
Followers 259.0K	Followers 54.5K	Followers 826
Votes 10.3K	Votes 2.5K	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No fork 2 NO LFS support
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	No integrations available	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitLab, AWS CodeCommit?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.