Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit

310
731
+ 1
189
AWS CodeStar

21
151
+ 1
3
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs AWS CodeStar: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; AWS CodeStar: Quickly Develop, Build, and Deploy Applications on AWS. Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodeStar are primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" and "Platform as a Service" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

  • Collaboration
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

On the other hand, AWS CodeStar provides the following key features:

  • Start developing on AWS in minutes
  • Manage software delivery in one place
  • Work across your team securely
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of AWS CodeStar
  • 43
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 23
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
  • 19
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 11
    I can make repository by myself if I have AWS account
  • 11
    Faster deployments when using other AWS services
  • 7
    AWS CodePipeline integration
  • 6
    Codebuild integration
  • 6
    Does not support web hooks yet! :(
  • 4
    Cost Effective
  • 2
    Elastic Beanstalk Integration
  • 2
    Integrated with AWS Ecosystem
  • 2
    No Git LFS! Dealbreaker for me
  • 1
    Integration via SQS/SNS for events (replaces webhooks)
  • 1
    Issue tracker
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Only US Region
  • 1
    Available in Ireland (Dublin) region
  • 1
    CodeDeploy Integration
  • 1
    Open source friendly
  • 1
    CodeCommit Trigger for an AWS Lambda Function
  • 0
    Ui
  • 2
    Simple to set up
  • 1
    Manual Steps Available
  • 0
    GitHub integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of AWS CodeStar
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No fork
  • 2
    No webhooks
  • 1
    Can't download file from UI
  • 1
    Only time based triggers
  • 0
    Accident-prone UI
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS CodeCommit?

    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    What is AWS CodeStar?

    Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodeStar as a desired skillset
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    CBRE
    United States of America Texas Richardson
    What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
    What companies use AWS CodeStar?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS CodeCommit or AWS CodeStar.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
    What tools integrate with AWS CodeStar?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodeStar?
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    GitHub Enterprise
    GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
    SVN (Subversion)
    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
    See all alternatives