StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Wildfly

Apache HTTP Server vs Wildfly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Wildfly
Wildfly
Stacks187
Followers226
Votes6

Apache HTTP Server vs Wildfly: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache HTTP Server and Wildfly are both widely used web servers, but they have some key differences that differentiate them from each other.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Apache HTTP Server is known for its high scalability and performance. It can handle a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently and is capable of serving static HTML pages quickly. On the other hand, Wildfly focuses more on providing a robust Java application server. It is designed to handle heavy loads and complex applications, making it suitable for enterprise-level deployments.

  2. Support for Java EE: Wildfly is a Java EE (Enterprise Edition) application server, which means it provides full support for Java EE specifications and APIs. It allows developers to build and deploy Java-based enterprise applications easily. Apache HTTP Server, on the other hand, is primarily a web server and does not offer native support for Java EE. While it can be used with Java-based applications, additional configuration and integration may be required.

  3. Administration and Management: Wildfly offers a comprehensive and user-friendly administration console that allows administrators to manage and monitor the server and deployed applications. It provides features like centralized configuration management, real-time monitoring, and fine-grained security controls. Apache HTTP Server, on the other hand, does not have a built-in administration console. Configuration is usually done through text files, and server monitoring may require third-party tools or plugins.

  4. Modularity and Extensibility: Wildfly is built on top of the modular JBoss Application Server architecture. It allows users to selectively enable or disable subsystems and services based on their requirements, resulting in a lighter and more efficient server configuration. Apache HTTP Server also supports modular architecture through its extensive module system. Users can add or remove modules to extend the functionality of the server. However, the modularity in Wildfly is more integrated and fine-grained, specifically tailored for Java applications.

  5. Supported Protocols and Technologies: Apache HTTP Server supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. It also offers support for CGI (Common Gateway Interface) and various scripting languages like Perl and PHP. Wildfly, being a Java EE application server, primarily focuses on Java-related technologies like Servlets, JavaServer Faces, and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB). While it can still be used as a traditional web server, its core functionality revolves around Java EE.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache HTTP Server has a huge and vibrant community around it. It is highly popular and widely used, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins available. Wildfly, being a Java EE application server, also has a strong community and ecosystem centered around Java enterprise development. It benefits from the broader Java community and ecosystem, which provides frameworks, libraries, and tools specifically tailored for Java EE applications.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server excels in scalability and performance, while Wildfly focuses more on providing a robust Java EE application server. They differ in terms of support for Java EE, administration and management features, modularity and extensibility, supported protocols and technologies, and the community and ecosystem around them.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Wildfly

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Wildfly
Wildfly

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

It is a flexible, lightweight, managed application runtime that helps you build amazing applications. It supports the latest standards for web development.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
187
Followers
22.8K
Followers
226
Votes
1.4K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 3
    Eclipse integration
  • 3
    Java
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Wildfly?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase