StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Apache HTTP Server vs Apache Tomcat vs nginx

Apache HTTP Server vs Apache Tomcat vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.9K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
NGINX
NGINX
Stacks114.7K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.8K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache HTTP Server vs Apache Tomcat vs nginx: What are the differences?

<Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, and nginx are popular web servers used for hosting websites. Each server has its own unique features and capabilities. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, and nginx.>

1. **Architecture**: Apache HTTP Server is primarily designed for serving static content over HTTP, while Apache Tomcat is a Java Servlet Container that is used for deploying Java-based web applications. nginx, on the other hand, is known for its high-performance, asynchronous architecture, making it a popular choice for serving dynamic content efficiently.

2. **Functionality**: Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible web server that can handle a wide range of web content, including static files, dynamic content, and CGI scripts. Apache Tomcat, being a Servlet Container, is specialized in executing Java-based applications, supporting Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), and Java WebSocket. nginx excels in handling high traffic loads and efficiently serving static files, making it suitable for websites with high concurrency requirements.

3. **Configuration**: Apache HTTP Server uses a configuration file (httpd.conf) written in Apache configuration language, allowing users to customize various server settings. Apache Tomcat utilizes XML configuration files (server.xml, context.xml) for defining server and application-specific configurations. nginx employs a simple and intuitive configuration syntax that is easy to understand and implement, providing flexibility in configuring server directives.

4. **Resource Consumption**: Apache HTTP Server is known to consume more system resources compared to nginx, especially under high traffic conditions, due to its multi-threaded architecture. Apache Tomcat requires more memory allocation to run Java-based applications efficiently, making it resource-intensive compared to both Apache HTTP Server and nginx. nginx is renowned for its low memory footprint and efficient resource utilization, making it a preferable choice for optimizing server performance.

5. **SSL/TLS Support**: Apache HTTP Server provides comprehensive support for SSL/TLS encryption through modules like mod_ssl, enabling secure data transmission over HTTPS protocols. Similarly, Apache Tomcat supports SSL/TLS encryption for securing web applications using Java-based libraries like JSSE. nginx offers native support for SSL/TLS termination, allowing efficient handling of encrypted connections and enhancing server security with features like Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS).

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party modules to enhance server functionality. Apache Tomcat boasts a strong ecosystem of Java developers and enterprises supporting Java-based web applications, fostering collaboration and innovation in the Java community. nginx has gained popularity for its responsive community, frequent software updates, and robust support for modern web technologies, attracting a diverse user base seeking high-performance web server solutions.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, and nginx differ in their architecture, functionality, configuration methods, resource consumption, SSL/TLS support, and community ecosystem, catering to diverse hosting requirements and preferences within the web server landscape.

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, NGINX, Apache Tomcat

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
NGINX
NGINX
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
64.9K
Stacks
114.7K
Stacks
16.8K
Followers
22.8K
Followers
61.9K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
1.4K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 1452
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, NGINX, Apache Tomcat?

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase