StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Anvil vs PythonAnywhere

Anvil vs PythonAnywhere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64
Anvil
Anvil
Stacks51
Followers219
Votes23

Anvil vs PythonAnywhere: What are the differences?

Anvil vs PythonAnywhere

Anvil and PythonAnywhere are two popular platforms used for building and deploying web applications. While both platforms offer similar features, they have distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

1. Scalability and Performance: Anvil provides horizontal scalability by automatically scaling to handle increasing user traffic. It offers robust infrastructure to ensure high performance and reliability for applications with a growing user base. On the other hand, PythonAnywhere is more suitable for smaller applications or projects that do not require high scalability as it does not provide automatic scaling capabilities.

2. Programming Language Support: Anvil supports Python as the programming language for building web applications. It provides a user-friendly, drag-and-drop interface for designing the front-end and a built-in Python editor for writing the back-end code. PythonAnywhere also supports Python as the primary programming language, but it also allows for the use of other languages such as Ruby, Perl, and Node.js, providing developers with more flexibility and options.

3. Deployment Process: Anvil offers a seamless deployment process, allowing users to deploy their applications in a few simple steps. It handles all the backend infrastructure and deployment tasks, making it easy for developers to focus on building their applications. On the other hand, PythonAnywhere provides a straightforward deployment process, but it requires more manual configuration and setup compared to Anvil.

4. Development Environment: Anvil provides an integrated development environment (IDE) that allows developers to build, test, and debug their applications within a single platform. It includes features such as code completion, syntax highlighting, and debugging tools, making the development process more efficient. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in IDE but provides a web-based code editor and supports integration with popular IDEs like PyCharm and Visual Studio Code.

5. Pricing Model: Anvil offers a freemium pricing model, providing a free tier with limited features and resources. It also offers paid plans with additional features and higher resource allocations. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, offers a similar pricing structure but does not have a free tier, with all plans requiring a paid subscription. The pricing plans for both platforms vary based on the level of resources required and the number of users.

6. Documentation and Support: Anvil provides comprehensive documentation and a vibrant community forum where developers can find resources, tutorials, and engage with other Anvil users. It offers responsive customer support to address any technical issues or inquiries. PythonAnywhere also has extensive documentation and a community forum, but its customer support is limited to email-based assistance.

In summary, Anvil and PythonAnywhere both provide web development and deployment solutions, but they differ in terms of scalability, programming language support, deployment process, development environment, pricing model, and documentation/support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Anvil
Anvil

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Anvil is a platform for building and hosting full-stack web apps written entirely in Python. Drag & drop your UI, then write Python on the front-end and back-end to make it all work. Web development has never been this easy (or fast)!

-
Drag and drop UI builder; Full-stack Python; Client-side Python; Built-in database; Built-in user authentication; Simple integration with existing services and code; On-site installation supported; Expose REST APIs with one line of code; Rich set of UI components: Forms, plotting, maps, and more; Built-in support for all your favourite Python packages; Simple but powerful version control; Team collaboration; Active Directory integration
Statistics
Stacks
90
Stacks
51
Followers
293
Followers
219
Votes
64
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Great support
  • 8
    Shell access
Cons
  • 1
    No root access
  • 1
    Really small community
Pros
  • 6
    Fast dashboards deployment
  • 4
    Python everywhere
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    Drag-and-drop UI builder
  • 3
    Easy to deploy
Integrations
Python
Python
Google Drive
Google Drive
Stripe
Stripe
Python
Python
Plotly.js
Plotly.js
Google Maps
Google Maps

What are some alternatives to PythonAnywhere, Anvil?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase