Ansible vs Chef vs Terraform: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Ansible, Chef, and Terraform are popular tools used in the field of IT automation and infrastructure management. While they all serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.
Ease of Use: Ansible stands out in terms of simplicity and ease of use. It relies on a YAML-based configuration file that is easy to understand and write. Chef, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve as it uses a domain-specific language (DSL) called Ruby, which requires knowledge of programming concepts. Terraform falls between the two, as it requires understanding of its HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL), but it also offers a straightforward approach for provisioning infrastructure.
Configuration Management vs. Orchestration: Chef focuses primarily on configuration management. It is designed to ensure that a host's desired state is maintained accurately by configuring and managing various resources. Ansible, on the other hand, is more focused on orchestration and aims to automate tasks at a higher level, allowing users to define playbooks and execute them across multiple hosts simultaneously. Terraform primarily focuses on provisioning infrastructure and managing cloud resources without delving deeply into configuration management.
Agent-Based vs. Agentless: Chef and Terraform both rely on agents (or agent-like components) that need to be installed on the target systems to execute configuration or provisioning tasks. Ansible, however, follows an agentless approach by using SSH or PowerShell remoting to remotely manage and control the target systems. This makes Ansible easier to install and maintain, as it does not require any agents to be deployed.
Community and Ecosystem: Ansible has a large and vibrant community, with numerous pre-built modules available, making it easier to automate various tasks. Chef also has a strong community and offers a vast number of community-contributed cookbooks to extend its functionality. Terraform, while relatively newer, has gained significant popularity due to its community-driven efforts and extensive provider ecosystem, allowing integration with various cloud providers.
State Management: Ansible operates in a stateless manner, with each task being idempotent and solely responsible for achieving the desired state. This means that each time Ansible is run, it ensures that the system is in the desired state without keeping track of previous states. Chef uses a convergent model, where it continuously inspects and takes action based on the system's current state, making it suitable for managing systems that need constant drift detection and repair. Terraform follows a declarative approach, maintaining a state file that tracks the resources it creates, updates, or destroys, providing a record of the infrastructure's state.
In Summary, Ansible focuses on simplicity and orchestration, with an agentless architecture and a large community, while Chef specializes in configuration management with a convergent model and a strong community, and Terraform emphasizes infrastructure provisioning with a declarative approach and a growing ecosystem.
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.
Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.
Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.
Access to 800+ Reusable Cookbooks;Integration with Leading Cloud Providers;Enterprise Platform Support including Windows and Solaris;Create, Bootstrap and Manage OpenStack Clouds;Easy Installation with 'one-click' Omnibus Installer;Automatic System Discovery with Ohai;Text-Based Search Capabilities;Multiple Environment Support;"Knife" Command Line Interface;"Dry Run" Mode for Testing Potential Changes;Manage 10,000+ Nodes on a Single Chef Server;Available as a Hosted Service;Centralized Activity and Resource Reporting;"Push" Command and Control Client Runs;Multi-Tenancy;Role-Based Access Control [RBAC];High Availability Installation Support and Verification;Centralized Authentication Using LDAP or Active Directory
Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
