Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodePipeline vs Ansible: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare AWS CodePipeline and Ansible, two popular tools in the field of DevOps, and highlight their key differences.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed service that can scale to handle large-scale deployments in a distributed environment. It leverages the extensive infrastructure of AWS to provide an elastic and scalable solution. On the other hand, Ansible is an agentless tool that relies on the resources of the host machine, making it suitable for smaller deployments or environments with limited resources.
Flexibility: AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with other AWS services, providing seamless integration and easy management of the entire software release process within the AWS ecosystem. It offers a wide range of pre-built integrations with various AWS services and third-party tools. Ansible, on the other hand, is a flexible tool that can be used with any infrastructure, not limited to AWS. It offers a broad set of modules and plays well with different platforms, making it platform-agnostic.
Complexity: AWS CodePipeline abstracts much of the underlying complexity of the deployment process by providing a simple and visual interface for configuring the release pipeline. It incorporates all the necessary stages and actions required for continuous delivery, such as build, test, and deployment. Ansible, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and scripting to define the deployment process. While it provides comprehensive control and customization, it can involve a steeper learning curve and more effort to set up initially.
Automation: AWS CodePipeline is designed primarily for continuous delivery and automation of software releases. It provides a seamless integration with other AWS services, allowing for automated deployments and updates. Ansible, while also capable of automation, is a more general-purpose IT automation tool that can be used for various tasks beyond software deployment. It provides a wide range of modules and features for infrastructure automation, configuration management, and more.
Cost: AWS CodePipeline is a managed service offered by AWS, which means it requires a subscription and incurs costs based on usage and the resources used. The cost can vary depending on factors such as pipeline complexity and the number of monthly active pipelines. Ansible, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is free to use. While it may require resources to host and manage, there are no subscription fees or direct costs associated with using Ansible.
Community and Support: AWS CodePipeline is backed by the extensive resources and support of AWS, which includes documentation, forums, and professional support services. It benefits from a large and active community of users and developers. Ansible, being an open-source tool, also has a vibrant community and provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and user forums. However, professional support options may vary depending on the support agreements offered by different vendors.
In summary, AWS CodePipeline is a scalable and tightly integrated service within the AWS ecosystem, providing a simplified deployment process. Ansible, on the other hand, offers flexibility, platform-agnostic capabilities, and extensive customization options, making it suitable for various infrastructure setups and automation tasks.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of AWS CodePipeline
- Simple to set up13
- Managed service8
- GitHub integration4
- Parallel Execution3
- Automatic deployment2
- Manual Steps Available0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2
Cons of AWS CodePipeline
- No project boards2
- No integration with "Power" 365 tools1