StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Real Time Data Processing
  5. Amazon Kinesis vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ

Amazon Kinesis vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Stacks795
Followers604
Votes9
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Stacks21.8K
Followers18.9K
Votes558
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks4.0K
Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K

Amazon Kinesis vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon Kinesis, Kafka, and RabbitMQ are popular distributed streaming platforms used for processing and managing large streams of data. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between them that make each platform suitable for different use cases. Below are the main differences between Amazon Kinesis, Kafka, and RabbitMQ.

  1. Scalability:

Amazon Kinesis is a fully managed service offered by AWS that can automatically scale to handle a high volume of incoming streaming data. It can handle large amounts of data and can scale to handle millions of data streams in real-time.

Kafka is known for its high scalability and fault-tolerance. It can handle thousands of messages per second with low latency and can scale horizontally by adding more Kafka brokers to distribute the load.

RabbitMQ, on the other hand, is built as a traditional message broker and can handle moderate to high message loads but may require careful configuration and provisioning to ensure scalability.

  1. Persistence and Data Retention:

Amazon Kinesis provides a default data retention period of 24 hours, which can be extended up to 7 days. It also offers options to store data in Amazon S3 for longer-term persistence.

Kafka is designed to provide durable storage of streaming data. It can retain data for a longer period of time, often weeks or even months, depending on the configuration.

RabbitMQ, being a traditional message broker, typically doesn't retain messages for a long time. It is more suitable for real-time message processing rather than persistent storage.

  1. Message Delivery Guarantees:

In Amazon Kinesis, once data is successfully delivered to a consumer, it is considered consumed and removed from the stream. It provides at-least-once delivery semantics, ensuring data durability within the retention period.

Kafka guarantees message delivery and fault-tolerance by replicating data across multiple brokers and providing configurable consistency guarantees. It offers strong durability and fault-tolerance even in the case of broker failures.

RabbitMQ provides flexible delivery semantics, including options for at-most-once, at-least-once, and exactly-once delivery guarantees. It supports message acknowledgements and can provide reliable delivery based on the configuration.

  1. Ease of Use and Management:

Amazon Kinesis is a fully managed service, which means that AWS takes care of the infrastructure and management aspects. It provides easy setup, monitoring, and integration with other AWS services.

Kafka requires more manual setup and management compared to Amazon Kinesis. It requires monitoring and configuration of several components such as brokers, topics, and partitions. However, it offers more flexibility and control over the infrastructure.

RabbitMQ is a self-contained messaging system that can be easily set up and managed. It provides a user-friendly interface and supports multiple programming languages for client integration.

  1. Community and Ecosystem:

Kafka has a thriving open-source community and a large ecosystem of tools and libraries built around it. It has become a popular choice for building real-time streaming platforms and has extensive documentation and community support.

RabbitMQ also has a strong community and ecosystem, with support for various messaging patterns and protocols. It provides a wide range of plugins and integrations for different use cases.

Amazon Kinesis, being an AWS service, is part of the broader AWS ecosystem and can be seamlessly integrated with other AWS services. It benefits from the extensive resources and support available from AWS.

  1. Use Cases:

Amazon Kinesis is suitable for real-time streaming data ingestion, processing, and analysis. It's commonly used in applications such as real-time analytics, IoT data processing, log and event data processing, and data ingestion pipelines.

Kafka is often used as a distributed streaming platform for building scalable and fault-tolerant data pipelines, real-time analytics, event sourcing, and log processing.

RabbitMQ is widely used as a message broker for decoupling distributed applications, implementing publish-subscribe patterns, and ensuring reliable message delivery across systems.

In Summary, Amazon Kinesis is a managed service that offers high scalability and real-time processing of streaming data with easy integration into the AWS ecosystem. Kafka provides high scalability, fault-tolerance, and durable storage of streaming data, making it suitable for building distributed streaming platforms. RabbitMQ is a flexible messaging system used for decoupling applications and ensuring reliable message delivery.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Kinesis, RabbitMQ, Kafka

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
André
André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k
Comments
mediafinger
mediafinger

Feb 13, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafkaRabbitMQRabbitMQ

The question for which Message Queue to use mentioned "availability, distributed, scalability, and monitoring". I don't think that this excludes many options already. I does not sound like you would take advantage of Kafka's strengths (replayability, based on an even sourcing architecture). You could pick one of the AMQP options.

I would recommend the RabbitMQ message broker, which not only implements the AMQP standard 0.9.1 (it can support 1.x or other protocols as well) but has also several very useful extensions built in. It ticks the boxes you mentioned and on top you will get a very flexible system, that allows you to build the architecture, pick the options and trade-offs that suite your case best.

For more information about RabbitMQ, please have a look at the linked markdown I assembled. The second half explains many configuration options. It also contains links to managed hosting and to libraries (though it is missing Python's - which should be Puka, I assume).

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Kafka
Kafka

Amazon Kinesis can collect and process hundreds of gigabytes of data per second from hundreds of thousands of sources, allowing you to easily write applications that process information in real-time, from sources such as web site click-streams, marketing and financial information, manufacturing instrumentation and social media, and operational logs and metering data.

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Real-time Processing- Amazon Kinesis enables you to collect and analyze information in real-time, allowing you to answer questions about the current state of your data, from inventory levels to stock trade frequencies, rather than having to wait for an out-of-date report;Easy to use- You can create a new stream, set the throughput requirements, and start streaming data quickly and easily. Amazon Kinesis automatically provisions and manages the storage required to reliably and durably collect your data stream;High throughput. Elastic.- Amazon Kinesis seamlessly scales to match the data throughput rate and volume of your data, from megabytes to terabytes per hour. Amazon Kinesis will scale up or down based on your needs;Integrate with Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon DynamoDB- With Amazon Kinesis, you can reliably collect, process, and transform all of your data in real-time before delivering it to data stores of your choice, where it can be used by existing or new applications. Connectors enable integration with Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon DynamoDB;Build Kinesis Applications- Amazon Kinesis provides developers with client libraries that enable the design and operation of real-time data processing applications. Just add the Amazon Kinesis Client Library to your Java application and it will be notified when new data is available for processing;Low Cost- Amazon Kinesis is cost-efficient for workloads of any scale. You can pay as you go, and you’ll only pay for the resources you use. You can get started by provisioning low throughput streams, and only pay a low hourly rate for the throughput you need
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported
Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.0K
GitHub Forks
14.8K
Stacks
795
Stacks
21.8K
Stacks
24.2K
Followers
604
Followers
18.9K
Followers
22.3K
Votes
9
Votes
558
Votes
607
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    Cost
Pros
  • 235
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 80
    Ease of configuration
  • 60
    I like the admin interface
  • 52
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 22
    Durable
Cons
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging

What are some alternatives to Amazon Kinesis, RabbitMQ, Kafka?

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Apache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar is a distributed messaging solution developed and released to open source at Yahoo. Pulsar supports both pub-sub messaging and queuing in a platform designed for performance, scalability, and ease of development and operation.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase