StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Algolia vs Typesense

Algolia vs Typesense

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Algolia
Algolia
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes699
Typesense
Typesense
Stacks70
Followers119
Votes39
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks826

Algolia vs Typesense: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, I will provide the key differences between Algolia and Typesense.

  1. Data Scalability: Algolia is a search-as-a-service platform that offers high scalability, allowing businesses to handle millions of queries per second across a large dataset. On the other hand, Typesense is a lightweight search engine that is designed to handle smaller datasets and lower query volumes.

  2. Focused Use Case: Algolia is ideal for complex search use cases that require advanced features such as faceting, filtering, and typo-tolerance. It provides various customizable options for search relevance and ranking. On the contrary, Typesense is designed for simpler search requirements, focusing on delivering instant search results without the need for extensive configurations or customizations.

  3. Ease of Deployment: Algolia offers a fully-hosted solution where businesses can use Algolia's infrastructure to power their search functionality. This eliminates the need for setting up and maintaining search servers. In contrast, Typesense can be self-hosted, allowing businesses to have more control over their search infrastructure and data.

  4. Query Performance: Algolia prioritizes fast response times, aiming for sub-50ms latency for search queries. It achieves this by optimizing the search infrastructure and leveraging distributed systems. Typesense also aims for low latency but may have slightly higher response times compared to Algolia due to its lightweight nature.

  5. Pricing Model: Algolia follows a usage-based pricing model, where businesses are billed based on the number of operations performed, including the number of indexed records and search queries. Typesense, on the other hand, offers a fixed pricing model based on the number of nodes in the cluster, regardless of the number of records or search queries.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Algolia has a larger and more mature community, which means there are more resources, libraries, and integrations available. It also has better documentation and support options. Typesense is relatively newer and may have a smaller community and less extensive ecosystem, although it is growing rapidly.

In Summary, the key differences between Algolia and Typesense lie in their scalability, use cases, deployment options, query performance, pricing model, and community/ecosystem size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Algolia, Typesense

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Algolia
Algolia
Typesense
Typesense

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Database search;Multi-attributes;Search as you type;Analytics dashboard; Ranking; Mobile; Search in any language;Understand users mistakes;Smart Highlighting;Realtime indexing;Protect your indexes from misuse;Discover realtime faceting;Search objects by location
Handles typographical errors elegantly; Simple to set-up and manage; Easy to tailor your search results to perfection; Meticulously designed and optimized for speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
826
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
70
Followers
1.1K
Followers
119
Votes
699
Votes
39
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    Ultra fast
  • 95
    Super easy to implement
  • 73
    Modern search engine
  • 71
    Excellent support
  • 70
    Easy setup, fast and relevant
Cons
  • 11
    Expensive
Pros
  • 5
    Free
  • 4
    Facet search
  • 4
    Easy to deploy
  • 3
    Search as you type
  • 3
    Ultra fast
Integrations
React
React
Ruby
Ruby
Jekyll
Jekyll
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native
Vue.js
Vue.js
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Docusaurus
Docusaurus
VuePress
VuePress
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Ruby
Ruby
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Algolia, Typesense?

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Solr

Solr

Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Quickwit

Quickwit

It is the next-gen search & analytics engine built for logs. It is designed from the ground up to offer cost-efficiency and high reliability on large data sets. Its benefits are most apparent in multi-tenancy or multi-index settings.

Dejavu

Dejavu

dejaVu fits the unmet need of being a hackable data browser for Elasticsearch. Existing browsers were either built with a legacy UI and had a lacking user experience or used server side rendering (I am looking at you, Kibana).

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope