Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ActiveMQ

453
1.1K
+ 1
76
Apache Camel

604
224
+ 1
21
Add tool

ActiveMQ vs Apache Camel: What are the differences?

ActiveMQ: A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client. Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License; Apache Camel: A versatile open source integration framework. An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

ActiveMQ belongs to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack, while Apache Camel can be primarily classified under "Integration Tools".

ActiveMQ is an open source tool with 1.53K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to ActiveMQ's open source repository on GitHub.

Intuit, Wix, and SoFi are some of the popular companies that use ActiveMQ, whereas Apache Camel is used by Auto Trader, Zola, and opening.io. ActiveMQ has a broader approval, being mentioned in 52 company stacks & 120 developers stacks; compared to Apache Camel, which is listed in 21 company stacks and 30 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of ActiveMQ
Pros of Apache Camel
  • 18
    Easy to use
  • 14
    Open source
  • 13
    Efficient
  • 10
    JMS compliant
  • 6
    High Availability
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 3
    Support XA (distributed transactions)
  • 3
    Persistence
  • 2
    Distributed Network of brokers
  • 1
    Highly configurable
  • 1
    Docker delievery
  • 0
    RabbitMQ
  • 5
    Based on Enterprise Integration Patterns
  • 4
    Free (open source)
  • 4
    Highly configurable
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 3
    Has over 250 components
  • 2
    Has great community

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of ActiveMQ
Cons of Apache Camel
  • 1
    Support
  • 1
    Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions
  • 1
    Difficult to scale
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is ActiveMQ?

    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

    What is Apache Camel?

    An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use ActiveMQ?
    What companies use Apache Camel?
    See which teams inside your own company are using ActiveMQ or Apache Camel.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
    What tools integrate with Apache Camel?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ and Apache Camel?
    RabbitMQ
    RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    Apollo
    Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
    IBM MQ
    It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
    ZeroMQ
    The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
    See all alternatives