StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. VMware vSphere vs Vagrant

VMware vSphere vs Vagrant

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30

VMware vSphere vs Vagrant: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown formatted text, we will outline the key differences between VMware vSphere and Vagrant. VMware vSphere and Vagrant are both virtualization platforms that offer various features and benefits for software development and deployment. However, they differ in several aspects that are important to consider based on specific use cases and requirements.

1. Scalability:

VMware vSphere is a powerful enterprise-level virtualization platform that provides high scalability, allowing multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. It offers advanced features like Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) and vSphere High Availability (HA) to efficiently manage resources and handle failover situations. On the other hand, while Vagrant can also create and manage virtual machines, it is primarily designed for small-scale development and testing environments, making it less suitable for large-scale production deployments.

2. Flexibility and Portability:

Vagrant is a tool specifically designed for creating and managing development environments. It uses configuration files (Vagrantfiles) to define the desired virtual machine setup, which can be easily shared among team members and replicated across different environments. This makes Vagrant highly flexible and portable, allowing developers to maintain consistency in their development workflow. In contrast, VMware vSphere is more focused on providing virtualization infrastructure for production environments and may not have the same level of flexibility and portability when it comes to replicating development environments.

3. Management and Automation:

VMware vSphere offers a comprehensive set of management tools and features, such as vCenter Server, that enable centralized management, monitoring, and automation of virtualized infrastructure. It provides an intuitive web-based interface and various APIs for managing and automating tasks. On the other hand, while Vagrant provides command-line tools and an easy-to-use interface for managing and provisioning virtual machines, it may not have the same level of advanced management and automation capabilities as VMware vSphere.

4. Integration with Cloud Services:

VMware vSphere provides integration with public cloud services like VMware Cloud on AWS and VMware Cloud Provider Program, allowing organizations to easily extend their virtualized infrastructure to the cloud. It offers seamless migration of workloads between on-premises and cloud environments, providing more flexibility and scalability options. In contrast, Vagrant is primarily focused on local development environments and may not have the same level of integration and compatibility with cloud services.

5. Snapshot and Cloning Features:

VMware vSphere offers powerful snapshot and cloning features that allow users to capture the state of a virtual machine at a specific point in time and easily create copies of it for testing or backup purposes. These features can be useful for troubleshooting, testing different configurations, and creating consistent development environments. On the other hand, while Vagrant supports provisioning and replicating virtual machines, it may not have the same level of snapshot and cloning capabilities as VMware vSphere.

6. Cost and Licensing:

VMware vSphere is a commercial product that requires purchasing licenses based on the number of physical CPUs or cores in the host servers. It also offers additional features and management tools that may require separate licenses or subscriptions. In contrast, Vagrant is an open-source tool that is free to use and distribute, making it a cost-effective choice for small-scale development and testing environments.

In summary, VMware vSphere and Vagrant differ in terms of scalability, flexibility, management and automation capabilities, integration with cloud services, snapshot and cloning features, as well as cost and licensing. These differences should be considered when selecting the most suitable virtualization platform based on specific use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
Statistics
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
608
Followers
7.8K
Followers
550
Votes
1.5K
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Feature rich
Cons
  • 9
    Price
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, VMware vSphere?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana