Testim vs WebdriverIO

Overview

WebdriverIO

Stacks426

Followers509

Votes40

GitHub Stars9.7K

Forks2.6K

Testim

Stacks34

Followers57

Votes0

Testim vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here we will discuss the key differences between Testim and WebdriverIO in the context of web testing automation.

Language Support: One major difference between Testim and WebdriverIO is the language support. Testim primarily uses JavaScript for writing test automation scripts, while WebdriverIO supports multiple languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, and other programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, etc.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: WebdriverIO is considered to have a steeper learning curve compared to Testim. Testim offers a visual, codeless test automation approach that allows testers with minimal programming knowledge to create and execute tests easily. On the other hand, WebdriverIO requires more technical expertise and knowledge of programming languages for effective test script creation and automation.
Built-in Test Infrastructure: Testim provides a built-in test infrastructure that includes cloud-based testing infrastructure for parallel and distributed testing. In contrast, WebdriverIO relies on external infrastructure for parallel testing, which may require additional setup and configuration.
Integration and Compatibility: Testim offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, making it easy to incorporate automated tests into the development pipeline. WebdriverIO also supports integrations with CI/CD tools but may require more manual setup and configurations.
Community and Support: WebdriverIO has a larger and more active community compared to Testim, which could provide more resources, forums, and support for testers using the tool. Testim, while having a supportive community, might not have the same level of resources available for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing.

In Summary, Testim focuses on simplicity and codeless automation for testers with limited programming knowledge, while WebdriverIO offers more flexibility and customization options for experienced testers with a stronger technical background.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WebdriverIO, Testim

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebdriverIO	Testim
WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.	It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.
Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface	Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 426	Stacks 34
Followers 509	Followers 57
Votes 40	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs 10 Open Source 8 Great community 7 Easy to setup 4 Best solution for broad browser support Cons 8 High maintenance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js Selenium	Travis CI GitHub Visual Studio Jira TeamCity Slack Codeship Trello Jenkins StrongLoop

What are some alternatives to WebdriverIO, Testim?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Testim vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here we will discuss the key differences between Testim and WebdriverIO in the context of web testing automation.

Language Support: One major difference between Testim and WebdriverIO is the language support. Testim primarily uses JavaScript for writing test automation scripts, while WebdriverIO supports multiple languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, and other programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, etc.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: WebdriverIO is considered to have a steeper learning curve compared to Testim. Testim offers a visual, codeless test automation approach that allows testers with minimal programming knowledge to create and execute tests easily. On the other hand, WebdriverIO requires more technical expertise and knowledge of programming languages for effective test script creation and automation.
Built-in Test Infrastructure: Testim provides a built-in test infrastructure that includes cloud-based testing infrastructure for parallel and distributed testing. In contrast, WebdriverIO relies on external infrastructure for parallel testing, which may require additional setup and configuration.
Integration and Compatibility: Testim offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, making it easy to incorporate automated tests into the development pipeline. WebdriverIO also supports integrations with CI/CD tools but may require more manual setup and configurations.
Community and Support: WebdriverIO has a larger and more active community compared to Testim, which could provide more resources, forums, and support for testers using the tool. Testim, while having a supportive community, might not have the same level of resources available for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing.

Testim vs WebdriverIO

Overview