Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Socket.IO

10.2K
8.5K
+ 1
775
uWebSockets

15
43
+ 1
0
Add tool

Socket.IO vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Developers describe Socket.IO as "Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)". It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed. On the other hand, uWebSockets is detailed as "Simple, secure & standards compliant web I/O for the most demanding of applications". It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.

Socket.IO and uWebSockets can be primarily classified as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.

Some of the features offered by Socket.IO are:

  • Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.
  • Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.
  • Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.

On the other hand, uWebSockets provides the following key features:

  • HTTP and Websockets
  • Built-in pub/sub support
  • HTTP routing

Socket.IO and uWebSockets are both open source tools. Socket.IO with 47.7K GitHub stars and 8.68K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than uWebSockets with 10.9K GitHub stars and 1.07K GitHub forks.

Advice on Socket.IO and uWebSockets
Needs advice
on
Socket.IOSocket.IOFirebaseFirebase
and
ApolloApollo

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance | 7 upvotes 路 317.5K views
Recommends
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 馃憢,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Socket.IO
Pros of uWebSockets
  • 214
    Real-time
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 141
    Node.js
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 101
    Open source
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 9
    Large community
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Socket.IO
    Cons of uWebSockets
    • 11
      Bad documentation
    • 4
      Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
    • 3
      Doesn't work on React Native
    • 2
      Websocket Errors
    • 2
      Small community
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Socket.IO?

      It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

      What is uWebSockets?

      It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention Socket.IO and uWebSockets as a desired skillset
      What companies use Socket.IO?
      What companies use uWebSockets?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Socket.IO or uWebSockets.
      Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Socket.IO?
      What tools integrate with uWebSockets?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Oct 3 2019 at 7:13PM

      Ably Realtime

      JavaScriptPythonNode.js+8
      4
      3358
      What are some alternatives to Socket.IO and uWebSockets?
      SignalR
      SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.
      SocketCluster
      SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.
      PubNub
      PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.
      Pusher
      Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.
      ExpressJS
      Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.
      See all alternatives