Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

SignalR

494
1.2K
+ 1
146
Socket.IO

13.2K
10.8K
+ 1
776
Add tool

SignalR vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

SignalR and Socket.IO are both real-time web communication frameworks that allow for bidirectional communication between a server and a client. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Transport protocols: SignalR primarily uses WebSockets as its default transport protocol, with fallback options to other protocols such as Server-Sent Events and Long Polling. On the other hand, Socket.IO supports a wider range of transport protocols such as WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, Long Polling, and Flash Sockets, providing more flexibility in adapting to different network environments.

  2. Platforms and languages: SignalR is specifically designed for Microsoft technologies like ASP.NET and .NET Core, making it an ideal choice for developers using these platforms. In contrast, Socket.IO is a language-agnostic framework that can be used with a variety of languages including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Go, allowing for more platform independence.

  3. Scalability: SignalR relies on a centralized server architecture where all the communications go through a centralized server. While it can handle a large number of concurrent connections, the scalability of SignalR is limited by the capabilities of the server. Socket.IO, on the other hand, implements a distributed Pub-Sub pattern and can scale horizontally across multiple servers, making it more suitable for highly scalable applications.

  4. Error handling: SignalR provides features for automatic reconnection and handling of connection failures, making it easier for developers to handle network disruptions. Socket.IO also provides similar error-handling capabilities, but it additionally supports automatic reconnection with back-off, providing more robustness in dealing with unstable network connections.

  5. API and features: SignalR provides a rich set of features out of the box, such as hubs for easily defining server-to-client communication and client-to-server invocation, strong type safety, and automatic serialization of complex objects. Socket.IO, on the other hand, offers a more minimalistic API, providing only the essential building blocks for real-time communication and leaving more room for customization and flexibility.

  6. Community and ecosystem: SignalR is primarily supported by Microsoft and has a large community of ASP.NET developers, providing a wealth of resources, libraries, and frameworks specifically tailored for SignalR. Socket.IO, although not officially backed by any specific company, has a vibrant open-source community with a wide range of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed modules that extend its functionality.

In summary, SignalR, developed by Microsoft, is tightly integrated with the .NET framework and primarily used in .NET-based applications, providing seamless support for real-time communication through websockets, long polling, and other transport mechanisms. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library that works across various platforms and programming languages, offering a more flexible and language-agnostic approach to real-time communication with features like fallback mechanisms for older browsers and seamless integration with Node.js ecosystems.

Advice on SignalR and Socket.IO
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 486.3K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam đź‘‹,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of SignalR
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
  • 10
    Simple
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 8
    JSON
  • 5
    Cool
  • 0
    Azure
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 10
    Large community
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 1
    Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of SignalR
Cons of Socket.IO
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 12
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Small community
  • 2
    Websocket Errors

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is SignalR?

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

What is Socket.IO?

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use SignalR?
What companies use Socket.IO?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with SignalR?
What tools integrate with Socket.IO?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to SignalR and Socket.IO?
Firebase
Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
Pusher
Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
WebRTC
It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.
MQTT
It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
See all alternatives