SignalFx vs Sysdig: What are the differences?

Developers describe SignalFx as "Monitoring and Operational Intelligence for the Cloud". We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data. On the other hand, Sysdig is detailed as "Open source container monitoring for all Linux container technologies, including Docker, LXC, etc". Sysdig is open source, system-level exploration: capture system state and activity from a running Linux instance, then save, filter and analyze Sysdig is scriptable in Lua and includes a command line interface and a powerful interactive UI, csysdig, that runs in your terminal. Think of sysdig as strace + tcpdump + htop + iftop + lsof + awesome sauce. With state of the art container visibility on top..

SignalFx can be classified as a tool in the "Performance Monitoring" category, while Sysdig is grouped under "Monitoring Tools".

Some of the features offered by SignalFx are:

• Beautiful streaming visualizations
• Meaningful, fast alerting using SignalFlow analytics
• High resolution metrics up to 1 sec

On the other hand, Sysdig provides the following key features:

• Real-Time Dashboard
• Historical Replay
• Dynamic Topology

Sysdig is an open source tool with 5.7K GitHub stars and 530 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Sysdig's open source repository on GitHub.

Vungle, CommonBond, and Gini are some of the popular companies that use Sysdig, whereas SignalFx is used by Clever, SignalFx, and Cadre. Sysdig has a broader approval, being mentioned in 5 company stacks & 4 developers stacks; compared to SignalFx, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.