Scrutinizer vs StyleCI: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing Scrutinizer and StyleCI, it's important to understand the key differences between these two code analysis tools.

1. **Integration**: Scrutinizer easily integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing seamless code analysis within the development workflow. On the other hand, StyleCI focuses solely on GitHub repositories, making it a suitable option for teams working exclusively on GitHub.

2. **Customization**: Scrutinizer offers a high level of customization through its extensive configuration options, allowing users to tailor the analysis process to their specific needs. Meanwhile, StyleCI provides a more streamlined approach with predefined coding standards, making it easier for teams seeking a straightforward setup.

3. **Supported Languages**: Scrutinizer supports a wide range of programming languages, including PHP, Python, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different types of projects. In contrast, StyleCI primarily focuses on PHP code analysis, which may limit its applicability for teams working with multiple languages.

4. **Continuous Integration**: Scrutinizer offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI, enabling automated code analysis within the continuous integration pipeline. StyleCI, on the other hand, lacks built-in support for CI/CD tools, requiring additional setup for integrating with such systems.

5. **Real-time Analysis**: Scrutinizer provides real-time code analysis feedback, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they write code. In comparison, StyleCI analyzes code changes through pull requests, offering a review process that can slightly slow down the development cycle.

6. **Pricing Model**: Scrutinizer offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of lines analyzed, making it suitable for projects of all sizes. However, StyleCI follows a subscription-based pricing model, which may be more cost-effective for larger teams but less appealing for individual developers or small projects.

In Summary, Scrutinizer and StyleCI differ in terms of integration flexibility, customization options, language support, continuous integration capabilities, real-time analysis feedback, and pricing models, catering to different needs within the development community.