StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. RuboCop vs SonarQube

RuboCop vs SonarQube

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41

RuboCop vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, tools and technologies play a vital role in ensuring the quality of code. Two popular tools used for code analysis and quality assurance are RuboCop and SonarQube. While both tools serve the same purpose, they have key differences that set them apart from each other. This article aims to highlight these differences.

  1. Intended Language: RuboCop is specifically designed for analyzing Ruby code, whereas SonarQube is a more versatile tool that supports a wide range of programming languages such as Java, C#, C/C++, JavaScript, and more.

  2. Static vs. Dynamic: RuboCop is primarily a static code analysis tool that identifies potential issues without executing the code. It focuses on analyzing the structure and style of the code. On the other hand, SonarQube performs both static and dynamic analysis by running the code and examining its behavior, providing more comprehensive results.

  3. Scope of Analysis: RuboCop analyzes code on a file-by-file basis, providing insights into individual files' quality. In contrast, SonarQube analyzes the entire codebase as a whole, enabling it to identify cross-file issues, duplicated code, and complex dependencies across projects.

  4. Extensibility and Customizability: RuboCop allows users to define custom rules and add additional plugins to extend its functionality. This feature enables developers to tailor the tool to fit their specific needs and coding standards. SonarQube also offers customization options, allowing users to define coding rules. However, its extensibility is more limited compared to RuboCop.

  5. Integration and Reporting: RuboCop provides command-line integration, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows and automated pipelines. It generates reports in various formats, including HTML and JSON, providing a detailed analysis of code quality. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides a web-based interface for convenient analysis and reporting. It generates comprehensive reports, including metrics, code smells, and vulnerability issues.

  6. Community Support and Ecosystem: RuboCop boasts a vibrant and active community with a wide range of plugins, extensions, and documentation available. This community support fosters continuous improvement and keeps the tool up-to-date with the latest Ruby coding standards. SonarQube also has an active community but with a broader focus on multiple programming languages, making it a valuable resource for developers working on different projects.

In summary, RuboCop is a specialized tool for analyzing Ruby code, focusing on static analysis and offering extensive customization. SonarQube, on the other hand, is a multi-language tool that combines static and dynamic analysis, providing a comprehensive view of the codebase. While RuboCop excels in Ruby-focused projects, SonarQube offers broader support and cross-project analysis capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SonarQube, RuboCop

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
RuboCop
RuboCop

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
222
Votes
53
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, RuboCop?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana