Pylint vs Review Board: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Pylint and Review Board highlighting their key differences.

1. **Static Analysis Tool**: Pylint is a static code analysis tool that checks Python code for errors, whereas Review Board is a web-based code review application that allows teams to review and discuss code changes.

2. **Focus on Code Quality**: Pylint focuses on identifying coding standards, potential bugs, and other metrics to improve code quality, while Review Board emphasizes collaborative code review processes for team members to provide feedback and improve overall codebase.

3. **Integration with Development Workflow**: Pylint integrates seamlessly into various IDEs like PyCharm and Visual Studio Code for real-time feedback, while Review Board integrates with version control systems like Git, Subversion, and Mercurial to facilitate structured code reviews within existing development workflows.

4. **Automatic Code Checks**: Pylint automatically checks code for programming errors, stylistic issues, and adherence to coding standards without human intervention, while Review Board relies on human reviewers to analyze code changes, provide feedback, and approve modifications before merging into the codebase.

5. **Deployment Options**: Pylint is typically run locally by individual developers on their codebase, whereas Review Board can be deployed on a centralized server to facilitate team-wide code review processes with notifications and discussion threads.

6. **Scalability**: Pylint is more focused on analyzing code at the module or package level, whereas Review Board is designed to handle code review processes across multiple repositories, branches, and projects, making it suitable for larger development teams with complex codebases.

In Summary, the key differences between Pylint and Review Board lie in their primary functionalities, focus areas, integration capabilities, deployment options, scalability, and automation levels in the code review and quality assurance processes.