Provar vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Provar

Stacks14

Followers33

Votes0

Provar vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Test Design Approach Provar is a codeless testing solution that enables users to create test cases using a point-and-click approach, allowing teams to design and execute automated tests without the need for extensive programming knowledge. In contrast, Selenium requires users to have a good understanding of programming languages such as Java, C#, or Python to design and implement automation scripts.
Key Difference 2: Platform Compatibility Provar is specifically built for Salesforce applications and is tightly integrated with Salesforce metadata, allowing for seamless test automation of Salesforce functionalities. On the other hand, Selenium is a general-purpose automation tool that can be used to automate web applications across different platforms and technologies.
Key Difference 3: Visual Testing Capabilities Provar provides built-in visual testing capabilities that allow users to validate the appearance and layout of the Salesforce applications being tested. This is achieved through image recognition algorithms that can verify the expected visual elements, such as page layouts, buttons, and icons. Selenium, on the other hand, does not have native visual testing features and requires additional plugins or integrations to achieve similar functionalities.
Key Difference 4: Parallel Test Execution Provar supports parallel test execution, which means multiple test cases can be executed simultaneously, saving time and increasing overall test efficiency. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where there are a large number of test cases to be executed. Selenium also supports parallel test execution, but the implementation requires additional frameworks or tools.
Key Difference 5: Reporting and Analytics Provar provides detailed test execution reports and analytics that offer insights into the test coverage, test results, and overall test quality. These reports facilitate easy identification of test failures, making it easier for teams to track issues and analyze the effectiveness of their test suites. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide built-in reporting and analytics features, requiring users to explore third-party plugins or frameworks to attain similar capabilities.
Key Difference 6: Test Data Management Provar offers test data management functionalities that help users manage and manipulate test data for various scenarios. Users can create, import, export, and manage test data sets, ensuring data integrity and providing flexibility in test execution. Selenium does not offer native test data management features, requiring users to rely on external data sources or custom coding for test data manipulation.

In Summary, Provar differentiates itself from Selenium through its codeless test design approach, platform compatibility with Salesforce applications, built-in visual testing capabilities, support for parallel test execution, detailed reporting and analytics, and test data management functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, Provar

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Provar
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	It is the easiest, fastest way to create automated tests for Salesforce. Many Salesforce developers are familiar with automated testing via Apex unit tests. Once you've created tests, it helps you execute them.
-	Debugging; Parameterized Testing; Scheduling; Parallel Testing; Reporting and Analysis; Seamless Integration; Continuous Integration; Access Control.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 14
Followers 12.6K	Followers 33
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Bugfender Salesforce Marketing Cloud Instabug Bugsnag Testrail TestNG HipTest

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Provar?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

BitBar

Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.

Related Comparisons

Provar vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Test Design Approach Provar is a codeless testing solution that enables users to create test cases using a point-and-click approach, allowing teams to design and execute automated tests without the need for extensive programming knowledge. In contrast, Selenium requires users to have a good understanding of programming languages such as Java, C#, or Python to design and implement automation scripts.
Key Difference 2: Platform Compatibility Provar is specifically built for Salesforce applications and is tightly integrated with Salesforce metadata, allowing for seamless test automation of Salesforce functionalities. On the other hand, Selenium is a general-purpose automation tool that can be used to automate web applications across different platforms and technologies.
Key Difference 3: Visual Testing Capabilities Provar provides built-in visual testing capabilities that allow users to validate the appearance and layout of the Salesforce applications being tested. This is achieved through image recognition algorithms that can verify the expected visual elements, such as page layouts, buttons, and icons. Selenium, on the other hand, does not have native visual testing features and requires additional plugins or integrations to achieve similar functionalities.
Key Difference 4: Parallel Test Execution Provar supports parallel test execution, which means multiple test cases can be executed simultaneously, saving time and increasing overall test efficiency. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where there are a large number of test cases to be executed. Selenium also supports parallel test execution, but the implementation requires additional frameworks or tools.
Key Difference 5: Reporting and Analytics Provar provides detailed test execution reports and analytics that offer insights into the test coverage, test results, and overall test quality. These reports facilitate easy identification of test failures, making it easier for teams to track issues and analyze the effectiveness of their test suites. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide built-in reporting and analytics features, requiring users to explore third-party plugins or frameworks to attain similar capabilities.
Key Difference 6: Test Data Management Provar offers test data management functionalities that help users manage and manipulate test data for various scenarios. Users can create, import, export, and manage test data sets, ensuring data integrity and providing flexibility in test execution. Selenium does not offer native test data management features, requiring users to rely on external data sources or custom coding for test data manipulation.

Provar vs Selenium

Overview