Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

PostCSS

1.3K
538
+ 1
49
Webpack

39.9K
27K
+ 1
752
Add tool

PostCSS vs Webpack: What are the differences?

PostCSS and Webpack are both popular tools used in web development, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.

  1. Build Process: While Webpack is primarily a module bundler, managing and optimizing the assets of a web application, PostCSS is a tool for processing CSS stylesheets. Webpack takes care of bundling together JavaScript, stylesheets, and other assets, whereas PostCSS focuses solely on transforming and optimizing CSS.

  2. Language Support: Webpack is designed to work with a wide range of programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and even other transpiled languages such as Vue or React. On the other hand, PostCSS is a CSS processor and is specifically focused on transforming CSS code.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Both PostCSS and Webpack have a rich ecosystem of plugins, but their purposes are different. Webpack plugins are generally used for asset optimization, code splitting, and providing additional functionalities to the build process. In contrast, PostCSS plugins are focused on transforming CSS, including adding vendor prefixes, minifying code, and optimizing stylesheets.

  4. Configuration: Webpack is highly configurable through its webpack.config.js file, which allows developers to define entry points, output destinations, loaders, and plugins. PostCSS, on the other hand, can be configured through a postcss.config.js file or directly in the project's package.json file.

  5. Integration: Webpack is often used as a build tool within a larger development workflow, integrating seamlessly with task runners like Gulp or Grunt. PostCSS is usually integrated with build systems like webpack, Rollup, or Gulp, providing its CSS processing capabilities as part of the overall build pipeline.

  6. Performance Impact: Depending on the project setup and the number of plugins used, Webpack can have a significant impact on build time and bundle size. PostCSS, however, is primarily focused on optimizing and transforming CSS and typically has a smaller performance footprint compared to Webpack.

In summary, Webpack is a powerful module bundler and build tool with a wide range of features, while PostCSS is a CSS processor that focuses on transforming and optimizing CSS code. While both tools have plugin ecosystems and can be integrated into different development workflows, their primary purposes and functionalities are distinct.

Advice on PostCSS and Webpack
awesomebanana2018
Needs advice
on
PostCSSPostCSSSassSass
and
StylusStylus

Originally, I was going to start using Sass with Parcel, but then I learned about Stylus, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and PostCSS, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
PostCSSPostCSS

You're not correct with saying "vs Postcss". You're using Less/Sass/Stylus/... to produce "CSS" (maybe extended means it has some future features) and then in any case PostCSS will play (it is shipped with Parcel/NextJS/CRA/...)

See more
Decisions about PostCSS and Webpack
Aleksandr Filatov
Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft · | 4 upvotes · 280K views
Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
See more

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of PostCSS
Pros of Webpack
  • 21
    The "babel" of CSS
  • 15
    Customizable
  • 8
    Autoprefixer
  • 2
    Variables
  • 1
    Mixins
  • 1
    CSS MQPacker
  • 1
    PostCSS Flexbugs Fixes
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
  • 4
    Overengineered, Underdeveloped
  • 2
    Makes it easy to bundle static assets
  • 2
    Webpack-Encore
  • 1
    Redundant
  • 1
    Better support in Browser Dev-Tools

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of PostCSS
Cons of Webpack
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 15
      Hard to configure
    • 5
      No clear direction
    • 2
      Spaghetti-Code out of the box
    • 2
      SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
    • 2
      Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
    • 2
      Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is PostCSS?

    PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

    What is Webpack?

    A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use PostCSS?
    What companies use Webpack?
    See which teams inside your own company are using PostCSS or Webpack.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with PostCSS?
    What tools integrate with Webpack?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to PostCSS and Webpack?
    Stylus
    Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.
    Sass
    Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.
    CSS Modules
    It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.
    Less
    Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.
    node-sass
    It is a library that provides binding for Node.js to LibSass, the C version of the popular stylesheet preprocessor, Sass. It allows you to natively compile .scss files to css at incredible speed and automatically via a connect middleware.
    See all alternatives