StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PMD vs SonarQube

PMD vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
PMD
PMD
Stacks46
Followers111
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.2K
Forks1.5K

PMD vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

PMD and SonarQube are both widely used static code analysis tools that help developers identify and fix vulnerabilities in their code. Let's explore the key differences between the two.

  1. Language Support: PMD primarily focuses on Java code analysis and supports several Java-related technologies such as JSP, XML, and SQL. On the other hand, SonarQube offers support for a wide range of programming languages including Java, C/C++, C#, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and many more. This makes SonarQube a more versatile tool for multi-language projects.

  2. Scalability: PMD is often considered more suitable for small to medium-sized projects due to its simplicity and lightweight nature. It can quickly analyze smaller codebases and provide valuable insights. Conversely, SonarQube is designed to handle larger and more complex projects. It provides advanced features like code coverage, code duplication detection, and integration with other DevOps tools, making it a better choice for enterprise-level applications.

  3. Rule Coverage: Both PMD and SonarQube come with a wide range of pre-defined rules to detect code issues. However, SonarQube offers a much larger rule set out-of-the-box, covering a broader range of code quality aspects. Additionally, SonarQube allows users to create custom rules and define quality profiles specific to their project requirements, providing more flexibility compared to PMD.

  4. Reporting and Visualization: SonarQube provides a comprehensive and user-friendly interface for viewing analysis results, generating reports, and visualizing code metrics. It offers interactive dashboards, trend analysis, and drill-down capabilities, allowing developers and project stakeholders to gain valuable insights into code quality trends. In contrast, PMD primarily relies on command-line output and simple HTML reports, lacking the rich visualization capabilities of SonarQube.

  5. Integration and Ecosystem: SonarQube integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and GitLab, enabling automatic code analysis as part of the development pipeline. It also has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions, further extending its functionality. PMD, on the other hand, has limited integration options and a smaller ecosystem.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: PMD is an open-source tool released under the Apache License 2.0, making it free to use and modify. SonarQube is available in both open-source (Community Edition) and commercial versions. The commercial versions of SonarQube offer additional features, support, and enterprise-grade support, but they come at a cost.

In summary, PMD specializes in identifying code issues and inefficiencies at a detailed level, while SonarQube provides a more comprehensive platform with a broader range of features, including continuous inspection, code quality metrics, and security vulnerability analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
PMD
PMD

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

It is a source code analyzer. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
supports multiple languages; enforce a coding standard for your codebase; built-in checks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
5.2K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
46
Followers
2.0K
Followers
111
Votes
53
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Gradle
Gradle
Windows
Windows
Java
Java
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, PMD?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana