Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Playwright

417
534
+ 1
76
Testim

29
53
+ 1
0
Add tool

Playwright vs Testim: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Playwright and Testim are both powerful automation testing tools that allow developers to write and execute tests for web applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways.

  1. Browser Compatibility: Playwright supports multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, allowing developers to run tests on different browsers effortlessly. On the other hand, Testim currently only supports Chrome, limiting the testing capabilities to one browser.

  2. Programming Languages: Playwright supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, and C#, allowing developers to write tests in their preferred language. Testim, however, primarily focuses on JavaScript, offering limited support for other programming languages.

  3. Element Identification: Playwright provides robust mechanisms for element identification, including CSS selectors, XPath, text content, and more. This allows developers to easily locate and interact with elements on web pages. Testim, on the other hand, relies heavily on CSS selectors, which may not be as flexible or powerful in certain scenarios.

  4. Parallel Execution: Playwright has built-in support for parallel test execution, enabling developers to run tests concurrently and significantly reduce the overall test execution time. Testim, on the other hand, does not have native parallel execution capabilities, which can impact the efficiency and speed of test execution.

  5. Test Reporting and Analytics: Playwright provides detailed test reports and analytics, including screenshots, videos, and performance metrics, which helps in debugging and identifying issues quickly. Testim also offers test reporting and analytics features, but they may not be as comprehensive or customizable as Playwright.

  6. Community and Support: Playwright has a growing community and good developer support, with active contributors and regular updates. Testim also has a supportive community but may not be as extensive or established as Playwright's community.

In summary, Playwright offers browser compatibility across multiple browsers, supports multiple programming languages, provides flexible element identification methods, has built-in parallel execution capabilities, offers comprehensive test reporting and analytics, and has a strong community and support. Testim, on the other hand, has limitations in terms of browser compatibility, programming language support, and parallel execution, while also lacking some advanced features in test reporting and analytics.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Testim
  • 13
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Playwright
    Cons of Testim
    • 12
      Less help
    • 3
      Node based
    • 2
      Does not execute outside of browser
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Playwright?

      It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

      What is Testim?

      It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Playwright?
      What companies use Testim?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Playwright or Testim.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Playwright?
      What tools integrate with Testim?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Playwright and Testim?
      Puppeteer
      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
      Selenium
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Protractor
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      Cypress
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      TestCafe
      It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
      See all alternatives