Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Play vs ReactiveUI: What are the differences?
Play: The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala. Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications; ReactiveUI: An advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms. It is an advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms that is inspired by functional reactive programming. It allows you to abstract mutable state away from your user interfaces, express the idea around a feature in one readable place and improve the testability of your application.
Play and ReactiveUI can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Play is an open source tool with 11.6K GitHub stars and 3.89K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Play's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Play
- Scala81
- Web-friendly architecture55
- Built on akka55
- Stateless50
- High-scalable47
- Fast46
- Open source40
- Java34
- High velocity27
- Fun24
- Lightweight9
- Non-blocking io8
- Developer friendly6
- Simple template engine5
- Scalability4
- Pure love3
- Resource efficient2
Pros of ReactiveUI
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Play
- Evolves fast, keep up with releases3
- Unnecessarily complicated1