OneSky vs Weblate

Overview

OneSky

Stacks23

Followers21

Votes6

Weblate

Stacks27

Followers26

Votes12

GitHub Stars5.5K

Forks1.2K

OneSky vs Weblate: What are the differences?

Introduction:

OneSky and Weblate are both popular localization platforms that help businesses manage and translate their content for a global audience. Despite having similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two platforms that can impact a company's localization strategy.

Translation Memory Functionality: OneSky offers a robust Translation Memory system that stores previous translations for reuse, ensuring consistency and efficiency throughout the localization process. Weblate, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in Translation Memory feature, which can lead to redundant work and inconsistencies in translations.
Collaboration Tools: Weblate excels in collaboration tools by providing features like role-based permissions, commenting, and task assignment within the platform. This enhances team communication and streamlines the workflow. In comparison, OneSky's collaboration tools are more basic, lacking the same level of functionality and customization options.
Compatibility with Version Control Systems: Weblate offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git, allowing for automatic synchronization of source content with the translation platform. OneSky, while also supporting some version control systems, may not offer the same level of integration, leading to potential manual processes for updating content.
Project Management Capabilities: OneSky provides project management features such as deadlines, progress tracking, and priority settings to help users effectively manage and prioritize localization tasks. Weblate, though offering project management tools as well, may not have the same level of customization and control over project workflows.
Supported File Formats: While both platforms support a wide range of file formats for localization, Weblate may have more extensive support for specific file types commonly used in software and website localization, providing users with greater flexibility in handling various content formats. OneSky, while versatile, may have limitations in the range of file format compatibility.

In Summary, OneSky and Weblate offer distinct advantages in areas such as Translation Memory, Collaboration Tools, Compatibility with Version Control Systems, Project Management Capabilities, and Supported File Formats, catering to different localization needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OneSky	Weblate
OneSky provides a powerful cloud-based translation management system (TMS) that streamlines the entire translation management process for mobile apps, websites and documents. OneSky offers professional translation services and application testing solutions in 60+ languages. Over 3,000 companies have used OneSky to expand their global presence.	Weblate is a libre software web-based continuous localization system used by over 1150+ opensource projects & companies in over 115+ countries around the World.
Translation Management System: Online translation editor, easy communication & monitoring tools, voting mechanisms, etc. The perfect tool to manage your own translators and crowdsourced effort.; Professional Translation Service: Native professional translators for 47 languages.; Comprehensive quality assurance tools, including placeholder validation, length validation, glossary, screenshot functions...etc.; Integrate with our API to automate file imports / exports.;	Continuous localization - connect to your VCS repository and bring translators closer to the development; Quality checks - ensure the translations meet your quality requirements; 20+ file formats - gettext, Xliff, JSON, Android, iOS, RESX and much more; Glossary - built in glossary to ensure consistent terminology within a translation; Machine translation - use third party machine translation services to bootstrap your translation; Translation memory - built in translation memory to speed up localization process; REST API and cli - integrate with your workflow or third party services
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 23	Stacks 27
Followers 21	Followers 26
Votes 6	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Crowd Translation Service 2 Support 1 Variety of input formats 1 Ease of use	Pros 2 Version control integration 1 API 1 Continuous localization 1 Quality checks 1 Detailed context
Integrations
No integrations available	Google Analytics GitHub Bitbucket GitLab Sentry Rollbar Matomo

What are some alternatives to OneSky, Weblate?

Localazy

Reportedly (by developers) the most friendly localization and translation management platform.

Crowdin

Crowdin is localization management software enchanced by AI for teams. Translate your apps, websites, games, documentation, marketing campaigns, and other content into 100+ languages. Create a native experience for your global customers.

Phrase

The Phrase Localization Platform is a unique, AI-powered language platform that integrates translation, scoring, and automation tools in one place for businesses and language service providers.

GitLocalize

GitLocalize is a continuous localization tool built for communities and teams that want to simplify their workflow when translating their content. GitLocalize automatically syncs with your repository so you can keep your workflow on GitHub.

Transifex

Transifex is a cloud-based localization platform built to help you manage the translation and localization of your app, website, video subtitles, and more. It acts as a repository for your content (think GitHub for translation) and includes tools for developers to get that content into Transifex automatically. Transifex also provides translators a web interface to submit translations.

shipi18n

Shipi18n is a translation API built for developers. Translate JSON and i18n files to 100+ languages while automatically preserving placeholders like {name}, {{count}}, and %s. Key features: • Native i18next support with CLDR pluralization (auto-generates _one, _few, _many, _other) • Placeholder preservation for ICU MessageFormat • 90-day translation memory caching • Key-based pricing (pay per unique string, not API calls) Developer tools: npm SDK, CLI, GitHub Action, Vite plugin, i18next backend

Soniox

Transcribe and translate speech in over 60 languages, in real-time, with high accuracy.

Tran.sl

Real time marketplace of translation services. We help companies make their products global by translating their software, social media and user generated content. Social media localization, document translation, software localization, API

i18next

It is an internationalization-framework written in and for JavaScript. But it's much more than that! It goes beyond just providing the standard i18n features such as (plurals, context, interpolation, format). It provides you with a complete solution to localize your product from web to mobile and desktop.

Lokalise

It is a translation management system, which is designed to make the process of localization faster and easier. Our platform reduces manual work and routine tasks that appear while translating web and mobile apps, games, and other software.

Related Comparisons

OneSky vs Weblate: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Translation Memory Functionality: OneSky offers a robust Translation Memory system that stores previous translations for reuse, ensuring consistency and efficiency throughout the localization process. Weblate, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in Translation Memory feature, which can lead to redundant work and inconsistencies in translations.
Collaboration Tools: Weblate excels in collaboration tools by providing features like role-based permissions, commenting, and task assignment within the platform. This enhances team communication and streamlines the workflow. In comparison, OneSky's collaboration tools are more basic, lacking the same level of functionality and customization options.
Compatibility with Version Control Systems: Weblate offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git, allowing for automatic synchronization of source content with the translation platform. OneSky, while also supporting some version control systems, may not offer the same level of integration, leading to potential manual processes for updating content.
Project Management Capabilities: OneSky provides project management features such as deadlines, progress tracking, and priority settings to help users effectively manage and prioritize localization tasks. Weblate, though offering project management tools as well, may not have the same level of customization and control over project workflows.
Supported File Formats: While both platforms support a wide range of file formats for localization, Weblate may have more extensive support for specific file types commonly used in software and website localization, providing users with greater flexibility in handling various content formats. OneSky, while versatile, may have limitations in the range of file format compatibility.

OneSky vs Weblate

Overview