StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. Nomad vs Vagrant

Nomad vs Vagrant

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
Nomad
Nomad
Stacks256
Followers344
Votes32
GitHub Stars15.9K
Forks2.0K

Nomad vs Vagrant: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides key differences between Nomad and Vagrant for website implementation.

1. **Deployment Method**: Nomad is designed for orchestrating containers and applications in a cluster, making it suitable for larger-scale deployments, whereas Vagrant is primarily used for developing and testing environments on a single machine or small setups.

2. **Use Cases**: Nomad is ideal for managing applications across multiple servers with automatic scaling and self-healing capabilities, whereas Vagrant is better suited for creating reproducible development environments and local setups for software development and testing.

3. **Virtualization Technology**: Nomad supports various virtualization technologies like Docker, QEMU, and raw-exec, providing flexibility in containerization and deployment, whereas Vagrant uses VirtualBox as a default provider but can integrate with other hypervisors like VMware and Docker through plugins.

4. **Orchestration Features**: Nomad provides sophisticated features for task scheduling, load balancing, and service discovery, making it a robust orchestration tool for production environments, while Vagrant focuses on simplifying the setup and management of development environments with its intuitive workflow and configuration files.

5. **Scalability**: Nomad is built for scalability and high-performance cluster management, enabling it to handle thousands of containers and applications across multiple nodes, unlike Vagrant, which is more suitable for individual developers or small teams working on local development projects.

6. **Community and Support**: Nomad is maintained by HashiCorp and has a growing community of users and contributors, ensuring continuous development and support, whereas Vagrant, also developed by HashiCorp, has been around longer and has a larger user base with extensive documentation and community resources available.

In Summary, the key differences between Nomad and Vagrant lie in their deployment method, use cases, virtualization technology, orchestrating features, scalability, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
Nomad
Nomad

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
Handles the scheduling and upgrading of the applications over time; With built-in dry-run execution, Nomad shows what scheduling decisions it will take before it takes them. Operators can approve or deny these changes to create a safe and reproducible workflow; Nomad runs applications and ensures they keep running in failure scenarios. In addition to long-running services, Nomad can schedule batch jobs, distributed cron jobs, and parameterized jobs; Stream logs, send signals, and interact with the file system of scheduled applications. These operator-friendly commands bring the familiar debugging tools to a scheduled world
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
256
Followers
7.8K
Followers
344
Votes
1.5K
Votes
32
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 7
    Built in Consul integration
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Bult-in Vault integration
  • 3
    Built-in federation support
  • 2
    Autoscaling support
Cons
  • 3
    Easy to start with
  • 1
    HCL language for configuration, an unpopular DSL
  • 1
    Small comunity
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Consul
Consul
Docker
Docker
Vault
Vault

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, Nomad?

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

YARN Hadoop

YARN Hadoop

Its fundamental idea is to split up the functionalities of resource management and job scheduling/monitoring into separate daemons. The idea is to have a global ResourceManager (RM) and per-application ApplicationMaster (AM).

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana