NinjaMock vs UXPin: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between NinjaMock and UXPin, two popular tools for creating wireframes and prototypes in the field of UX design.

1. **Collaboration Features**: NinjaMock offers real-time collaboration where multiple users can work on the same project simultaneously, while UXPin allows for collaboration with stakeholders through commenting and feedback options.
2. **Prototyping Capabilities**: NinjaMock focuses on creating interactive prototypes with basic animations, while UXPin provides advanced prototyping features including interactions, states, and conditional logic.
3. **Asset Libraries**: NinjaMock provides a comprehensive library of UI elements, icons, and templates for rapid wireframing, whereas UXPin offers design systems integration and the ability to create custom component libraries.
4. **User Testing Tools**: In NinjaMock, user testing can be conducted with clickable prototypes, but UXPin goes a step further by providing user testing features such as heatmaps, session recordings, and feedback collection tools.
5. **Integration Options**: UXPin offers seamless integrations with popular design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD, as well as project management platforms such as Jira and Slack, while NinjaMock has limited integrations with other software.
6. **Price Plans**: NinjaMock offers a more affordable pricing structure with a free plan for individuals, whereas UXPin is targeted towards larger teams and enterprises with tiered pricing based on features and users.

In Summary, NinjaMock and UXPin differ in terms of collaboration features, prototyping capabilities, asset libraries, user testing tools, integration options, and price plans, catering to different needs and preferences in the UX design industry.