Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
nginx vs node-http-proxy: What are the differences?
Introduction
The purpose of this task is to provide a comparison between nginx and node-http-proxy, highlighting the key differences between the two options for website hosting and proxying.
Compatibility: nginx is a web server and reverse proxy server, whereas node-http-proxy is a pure Node.js HTTP proxy library. While nginx can work with a wide range of web servers and technologies, node-http-proxy is specifically designed for Node.js applications.
Simplicity: nginx is generally considered to be easier to set up and configure, with a simpler and more intuitive syntax for its configuration files. On the other hand, node-http-proxy requires deeper knowledge of JavaScript and the Node.js ecosystem to effectively utilize.
Flexibility: nginx offers a wide range of features and modules, allowing for advanced functionalities such as load balancing, caching, SSL termination, and more. Node-http-proxy, being a JavaScript library, allows for greater flexibility and customization, as developers can modify and extend its behavior as per their specific requirements.
Performance: nginx is highly regarded for its performance and efficiency, as it is designed to handle a large number of simultaneous connections and efficiently serve static content. Node-http-proxy leverages the capabilities of Node.js, which excels in handling I/O-intensive tasks, making it suitable for certain use cases, but it may not match the performance of nginx in all scenarios, especially for high-traffic websites.
Community and Support: nginx has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, resources, and plugins available. It is a well-established solution used in production by many organizations. Node-http-proxy has a smaller community and may require more self-reliance, with fewer plugins and resources available.
Ease of Integration: nginx can be easily integrated with other tools and technologies, such as Docker, Kubernetes, and CDN providers. It has integrations with various logging and monitoring tools as well. Node-http-proxy, being a library, can be integrated directly into Node.js applications but may require additional effort for integration with other systems.
In summary, nginx is a versatile web server and reverse proxy with a wide range of features, known for its performance and simplicity, while node-http-proxy offers flexibility and deeper integration options, but may require more expertise in the Node.js ecosystem.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance893
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free288
- Scalability288
- Web server225
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Reversy Proxy3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- GRPC-Web2
- Blash2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Pros of node-http-proxy
- Opensource1
- Programmable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10
Cons of node-http-proxy
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is NGINX?
What is node-http-proxy?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with node-http-proxy?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+17
+22
+31+46+15
+6+9