StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Vuetify

Next.js vs Vuetify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Vuetify
Vuetify
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.8K
Votes170
GitHub Stars40.8K
Forks7.1K

Next.js vs Vuetify: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and Vuetify are popular technologies used in web development. Next.js is a React framework that focuses on server-side rendering and provides additional features like automatic code-splitting and static site generation. On the other hand, Vuetify is a Material Design component framework for Vue.js that offers a wide range of pre-built UI components. While both technologies have their strengths, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Server-side rendering vs. client-side rendering: Next.js primarily focuses on server-side rendering, which means that the JavaScript code is executed on the server and the rendered HTML is sent to the client. This allows for faster initial page loads and better SEO. Vuetify, on the other hand, is primarily used for client-side rendering where the JavaScript code is executed on the client's browser. This provides more interactivity but may result in slower initial page loads.

  2. React vs. Vue.js: Next.js is built on top of React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. React uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update only the necessary parts of the user interface. Vuetify, on the other hand, is a component framework for Vue.js, another popular JavaScript framework. Vue.js also has a virtual DOM but has a different API and ecosystem compared to React.

  3. Routing: Next.js provides built-in routing capabilities, allowing developers to define page routes easily. It also supports dynamic routing, where pages can be generated based on dynamic parameters. Vuetify, on the other hand, focuses more on UI components and does not provide built-in routing capabilities. Developers using Vuetify would need to rely on a separate routing library or implement their own routing solution.

  4. Styling: Vuetify provides a wide range of pre-built Material Design themed components that come with their own styling. This allows developers to quickly build UIs without spending too much time on styling. Next.js, on the other hand, is more flexible when it comes to styling. Developers have the freedom to choose their preferred styling solutions like CSS modules, CSS-in-JS, or a third-party styling library.

  5. Community and ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community of developers due to its popularity. This means that finding help, tutorials, and resources for Next.js is relatively easier. Additionally, Next.js benefits from the wider React ecosystem, which includes libraries and tools for various purposes. Vuetify also has a sizable community, albeit smaller compared to Next.js. However, as it is built for Vue.js, it leverages the Vue ecosystem, which has its own set of libraries and tools.

  6. Documentation and learning curve: Next.js has extensive documentation and learning resources, making it easier for developers to get started and learn the framework. It also benefits from the popularity of React, which has a wealth of tutorials and guides available. Vuetify, while having its own documentation, might have a slightly steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Vue.js. However, Vue.js itself has a well-documented website and a growing number of learning resources.

In summary, Next.js and Vuetify differ in their approach to rendering, the underlying frameworks they are built upon, routing capabilities, styling options, the size of their communities, and the learning curve involved. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the technology that best suits their project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Vuetify

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Vuetify
Vuetify

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
40.8K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
5.1K
Followers
1.8K
Votes
330
Votes
170
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 29
    Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs
  • 24
    Wide range of components and active development
  • 22
    Vue
  • 18
    New age components
  • 13
    Easy integration
Cons
  • 19
    It is heavy
  • 3
    Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)
Integrations
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Vuetify?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase