Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs Vuetify: What are the differences?
Introduction
Next.js and Vuetify are popular technologies used in web development. Next.js is a React framework that focuses on server-side rendering and provides additional features like automatic code-splitting and static site generation. On the other hand, Vuetify is a Material Design component framework for Vue.js that offers a wide range of pre-built UI components. While both technologies have their strengths, there are key differences that set them apart.
Server-side rendering vs. client-side rendering: Next.js primarily focuses on server-side rendering, which means that the JavaScript code is executed on the server and the rendered HTML is sent to the client. This allows for faster initial page loads and better SEO. Vuetify, on the other hand, is primarily used for client-side rendering where the JavaScript code is executed on the client's browser. This provides more interactivity but may result in slower initial page loads.
React vs. Vue.js: Next.js is built on top of React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. React uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update only the necessary parts of the user interface. Vuetify, on the other hand, is a component framework for Vue.js, another popular JavaScript framework. Vue.js also has a virtual DOM but has a different API and ecosystem compared to React.
Routing: Next.js provides built-in routing capabilities, allowing developers to define page routes easily. It also supports dynamic routing, where pages can be generated based on dynamic parameters. Vuetify, on the other hand, focuses more on UI components and does not provide built-in routing capabilities. Developers using Vuetify would need to rely on a separate routing library or implement their own routing solution.
Styling: Vuetify provides a wide range of pre-built Material Design themed components that come with their own styling. This allows developers to quickly build UIs without spending too much time on styling. Next.js, on the other hand, is more flexible when it comes to styling. Developers have the freedom to choose their preferred styling solutions like CSS modules, CSS-in-JS, or a third-party styling library.
Community and ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community of developers due to its popularity. This means that finding help, tutorials, and resources for Next.js is relatively easier. Additionally, Next.js benefits from the wider React ecosystem, which includes libraries and tools for various purposes. Vuetify also has a sizable community, albeit smaller compared to Next.js. However, as it is built for Vue.js, it leverages the Vue ecosystem, which has its own set of libraries and tools.
Documentation and learning curve: Next.js has extensive documentation and learning resources, making it easier for developers to get started and learn the framework. It also benefits from the popularity of React, which has a wealth of tutorials and guides available. Vuetify, while having its own documentation, might have a slightly steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Vue.js. However, Vue.js itself has a well-documented website and a growing number of learning resources.
In summary, Next.js and Vuetify differ in their approach to rendering, the underlying frameworks they are built upon, routing capabilities, styling options, the size of their communities, and the learning curve involved. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the technology that best suits their project requirements and preferences.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting50
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Pros of Vuetify
- Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs29
- Wide range of components and active development24
- Vue22
- New age components18
- Easy integration13
- Material Design11
- Nuxt.js10
- Open Source10
- Awesome Documentation6
- Awesome Component collection5
- Internationalization5
- Not tied to jQuery5
- Best use of vue slots you'll ever see4
- Not tied to jQuery2
- Treeshaking2
- Active Community2
- Responsiveness2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9
Cons of Vuetify
- It is heavy19
- Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)3