MSMQ vs RabbitMQ

Overview

RabbitMQ

Stacks21.8K

Followers18.9K

Votes558

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks4.0K

MSMQ

Stacks33

Followers118

Votes3

MSMQ vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

MSMQ (Microsoft Message Queuing) and RabbitMQ are both message queuing technologies used for reliable communication between distributed systems. Here are the key difference between MSMQ and RabbitMQ:

Platform and Vendor: MSMQ is a messaging middleware developed by Microsoft and is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, is an open-source message broker that runs on multiple platforms and can be used with various programming languages.
Protocol and Messaging Patterns: MSMQ primarily uses the MSMQ protocol and supports point-to-point and publish-subscribe messaging patterns. RabbitMQ uses the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and offers more advanced messaging patterns, including request-reply, publish-subscribe, and worker queues.
Language Support: MSMQ is deeply integrated with the Windows environment and is primarily used in .NET applications. RabbitMQ supports multiple programming languages, making it a more versatile choice for cross-platform development.
Persistence and Durability: Both MSMQ and RabbitMQ support message persistence, ensuring that messages are not lost even if the system crashes. However, RabbitMQ offers more advanced durability options, allowing messages to be stored on disk and providing higher levels of reliability.
Scalability and Performance: RabbitMQ is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for large-scale distributed systems. It provides clustering and load balancing features to handle heavy workloads. MSMQ is well-suited for Windows-centric environments but may have limitations in terms of scalability compared to RabbitMQ.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: MSMQ is relatively easy to set up in Windows environments due to its integration with the operating system. RabbitMQ requires more manual setup and configuration, but it offers greater flexibility in terms of deployment options and platform support.

In summary, MSMQ is a Windows-centric messaging solution that integrates well with .NET applications, while RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker with broader language support and advanced messaging patterns.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on RabbitMQ, MSMQ

viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

ASP.NET Core

MSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k

Comments

André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k

Comments

mediafinger

Feb 13, 2019

Reviewon

Kafka

RabbitMQ

The question for which Message Queue to use mentioned "availability, distributed, scalability, and monitoring". I don't think that this excludes many options already. I does not sound like you would take advantage of Kafka's strengths (replayability, based on an even sourcing architecture). You could pick one of the AMQP options.

I would recommend the RabbitMQ message broker, which not only implements the AMQP standard 0.9.1 (it can support 1.x or other protocols as well) but has also several very useful extensions built in. It ticks the boxes you mentioned and on top you will get a very flexible system, that allows you to build the architecture, pick the options and trade-offs that suite your case best.

For more information about RabbitMQ, please have a look at the linked markdown I assembled. The second half explains many configuration options. It also contains links to managed hosting and to libraries (though it is missing Python's - which should be Puka, I assume).

159k views159k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RabbitMQ	MSMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.	This technology enables applications running at different times to communicate across heterogeneous networks and systems that may be temporarily offline. Applications send messages to queues and read messages from queues.
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 21.8K	Stacks 33
Followers 18.9K	Followers 118
Votes 558	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 235 It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring 80 Ease of configuration 60 I like the admin interface 52 Easy to set-up and start with 22 Durable Cons 9 Too complicated cluster/HA config and management 6 Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime 5 Configuration must be done first, not by your code 4 Slow	Pros 2 Easy to learn 1 Cloud not needed Cons 1 Windows dependency

What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ, MSMQ?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Related Comparisons

Platform and Vendor: MSMQ is a messaging middleware developed by Microsoft and is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, is an open-source message broker that runs on multiple platforms and can be used with various programming languages.
Protocol and Messaging Patterns: MSMQ primarily uses the MSMQ protocol and supports point-to-point and publish-subscribe messaging patterns. RabbitMQ uses the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and offers more advanced messaging patterns, including request-reply, publish-subscribe, and worker queues.
Language Support: MSMQ is deeply integrated with the Windows environment and is primarily used in .NET applications. RabbitMQ supports multiple programming languages, making it a more versatile choice for cross-platform development.
Persistence and Durability: Both MSMQ and RabbitMQ support message persistence, ensuring that messages are not lost even if the system crashes. However, RabbitMQ offers more advanced durability options, allowing messages to be stored on disk and providing higher levels of reliability.
Scalability and Performance: RabbitMQ is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for large-scale distributed systems. It provides clustering and load balancing features to handle heavy workloads. MSMQ is well-suited for Windows-centric environments but may have limitations in terms of scalability compared to RabbitMQ.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: MSMQ is relatively easy to set up in Windows environments due to its integration with the operating system. RabbitMQ requires more manual setup and configuration, but it offers greater flexibility in terms of deployment options and platform support.

MSMQ vs RabbitMQ