StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Milvus vs Solr

Milvus vs Solr

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Solr
Solr
Stacks780
Followers644
Votes126
Milvus
Milvus
Stacks57
Followers49
Votes2
GitHub Stars38.3K
Forks3.5K

Milvus vs Solr: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code presents the key differences between Milvus and Solr. Milvus is an open-source similarity search engine while Solr is an open-source search platform based on Apache Lucene. The differences between Milvus and Solr are outlined below.

  1. Inverted Indexing vs Vector Similarity Searching: Solr is primarily focused on full-text search capabilities with support for inverted indexing. In contrast, Milvus is designed specifically for similarity search, using vector similarity searching algorithms for efficient retrieval of similar items based on their feature vectors.

  2. Scalability: Both Milvus and Solr are designed to handle large-scale data, but they differ in their underlying architecture. Milvus adopts the distributed architecture, allowing for easy scalability and high availability. Solr, on the other hand, is built on a master-slave architecture, where scalability depends on adding additional nodes to the cluster manually.

  3. Supported Data Types: Solr provides support for a wide range of data types, including text, numbers, dates, and more. It also supports faceted search, filtering, and geo-spatial search. Milvus, being focused on similarity search, is specifically optimized for handling vector data types, such as high-dimensional feature vectors commonly used in machine learning and deep learning tasks.

  4. Query Capabilities: Solr offers rich query capabilities with support for boolean search, fuzzy search, wildcard search, and complex queries using query parsers. Milvus, on the other hand, provides similarity search operations based on vector embeddings. Its query capabilities are centered around finding items that are most similar or have the highest similarity score to a given query vector.

  5. Use Cases: Solr is widely used in various applications for text search, document indexing, and retrieval. It is commonly used in enterprise search, e-commerce platforms, and content management systems. Milvus is specifically designed for similarity search applications, making it suitable for image search, recommendation systems, natural language processing, and other tasks where finding similar items is crucial.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Solr enjoys a large and active community with a vast ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and documentation. It has been widely adopted and proven in numerous production systems. Milvus, being relatively new, is rapidly growing its community and ecosystem. However, its focus on similarity search means that it may have a smaller user base but a more targeted and specialized community.

In Summary, Milvus and Solr differ in their approach to search. Milvus is optimized for similarity search using vector similarity searching algorithms, while Solr is focused on full-text search capabilities with support for inverted indexing. They differ in scalability, supported data types, query capabilities, use cases, and the size and focus of their respective communities.

Detailed Comparison

Solr
Solr
Milvus
Milvus

Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

Milvus is an open source vector database. Built with heterogeneous computing architecture for the best cost efficiency. Searches over billion-scale vectors take only milliseconds with minimum computing resources.

Advanced full-text search capabilities; Optimized for high volume web traffic; Standards-based open interfaces - XML, JSON and HTTP; Comprehensive HTML administration interfaces; Server statistics exposed over JMX for monitoring; Linearly scalable, auto index replication, auto-failover and recovery; Near real-time indexing; Flexible and adaptable with XML configuration; Extensible plugin architecture
Heterogeneous computing; Multiple indexes; Intelligent resource management; Horizontal scalability; High availability
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
38.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.5K
Stacks
780
Stacks
57
Followers
644
Followers
49
Votes
126
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Powerful
  • 22
    Indexing and searching
  • 20
    Scalable
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 13
    Enterprise Ready
Pros
  • 2
    Best similarity search engine, fast and easy to use
Integrations
Lucene
Lucene
Hugging Face
Hugging Face
Java
Java
CentOS
CentOS
Python
Python
PyTorch
PyTorch
C++
C++
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Cohere
Cohere

What are some alternatives to Solr, Milvus?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Dejavu

Dejavu

dejaVu fits the unmet need of being a hackable data browser for Elasticsearch. Existing browsers were either built with a legacy UI and had a lacking user experience or used server side rendering (I am looking at you, Kibana).

Elassandra

Elassandra

Elassandra is a fork of Elasticsearch modified to run on top of Apache Cassandra in a scalable and resilient peer-to-peer architecture. Elasticsearch code is embedded in Cassanda nodes providing advanced search features on Cassandra tables and Cassandra serve as an Elasticsearch data and configuration store.

Tantivy

Tantivy

It is a full-text search engine library inspired by Apache Lucene and written in Rust. It is not an off-the-shelf search engine server, but rather a crate that can be used to build such a search engine.

Jina

Jina

It is geared towards building search systems for any kind of data, including text, images, audio, video and many more. With the modular design & multi-layer abstraction, you can leverage the efficient patterns to build the system by parts, or chaining them into a Flow for an end-to-end experience.

Mirage

Mirage

The Elasticsearch query DSL supports 100+ query APIs ranging from full-text search, numeric range filters, geolocation queries to nested and span queries. Mirage is a modern, open-source web based query explorer for Elasticsearch.

Qdrant

Qdrant

It is an open-source Vector Search Engine and Vector Database written in Rust. It deploys as an API service providing search for the nearest high-dimensional vectors. With Qdrant, embeddings or neural network encoders can be turned into full-fledged applications for matching, searching, recommending, and much more.

Chroma

Chroma

It is an open-source embedding database. Chroma makes it easy to build LLM apps by making knowledge, facts, and skills pluggable for LLMs.

Elastic

Elastic

Elastic is an Elasticsearch client for the Go programming language.

Searchkit

Searchkit

Searchkit is a suite of React components that communicate directly with your Elasticsearch cluster. Each component is built in React and is fully customisable to your needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase