StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. MeiliSearch vs Sonic Server

MeiliSearch vs Sonic Server

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sonic Server
Sonic Server
Stacks4
Followers24
Votes0
GitHub Stars21.0K
Forks604
MeiliSearch
MeiliSearch
Stacks121
Followers123
Votes10
GitHub Stars54.3K
Forks2.2K

MeiliSearch vs Sonic Server: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between MeiliSearch and Sonic Server

  1. 1. Data Structure and Querying Capabilities: MeiliSearch uses an inverted index based on n-grams to efficiently handle search queries, enabling it to support fuzzy search, synonyms, and typo tolerance. On the other hand, Sonic Server utilizes an inverted index based on full-text search, allowing more complex queries with options like filtering, sorting, and pagination.

  2. 2. Scalability and Performance: MeiliSearch is designed to handle small to medium-sized data sets efficiently, making it suitable for use cases with limited resources or low search volumes. In contrast, Sonic Server is built for handling large and highly scalable search indexes, suitable for applications demanding high-performance search capabilities even with a large amount of data.

  3. 3. Real-time Indexing: MeiliSearch offers real-time indexing, meaning that it can immediately reflect any changes made to the indexed data without the need for an indexing delay. Sonic Server, however, requires an indexing delay to update the search index, making it more suitable for scenarios where real-time updates are not crucial.

  4. 4. Customization and Extensibility: MeiliSearch provides a user-friendly and customizable search experience, allowing developers to easily tweak relevance settings and implement custom ranking rules. Sonic Server, on the other hand, supports users in defining custom analyzers and query rules, providing more fine-grained control and flexibility over the search process.

  5. 5. Language Support: MeiliSearch supports multiple languages out of the box, including stemming and stop words for enhanced search accuracy across different languages. In contrast, Sonic Server does not have built-in support for language-specific features, requiring developers to handle language processing separately.

  6. 6. Integration Ecosystem: MeiliSearch has a rich ecosystem of pre-built integrations and plugins, making it easier to connect and integrate with various frameworks, content management systems, and programming languages. Sonic Server, while still offering compatibility with various programming languages, has a less extensive ecosystem with fewer pre-built integrations available.

In summary, MeiliSearch is well-suited for small to medium-sized data sets, offers real-time indexing, and provides a user-friendly search experience with customization options. On the other hand, Sonic Server excels in handling large-scale data sets, has more control over the search process, and offers extensive language support.

Detailed Comparison

Sonic Server
Sonic Server
MeiliSearch
MeiliSearch

A fast, lightweight and schema-less search backend. It ingests search texts and identifier tuples that can then be queried against in microseconds.

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Search terms are stored in collections, organized in buckets; Search results return object identifiers;; Search query typos are corrected; Insert and remove items in the index; Auto-complete any word in real-time;; Full Unicode compatibility; Networked channel interface; Easy-to-use libraries
Search as-you-type experience (answers < 50ms); Full-text search; Typo tolerant (understands typos and spelling mistakes); Supports Kanji; Supports Synonym; Easy to install, deploy, and maintain; Whole documents returned; Highly customizable; RESTfull API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.0K
GitHub Stars
54.3K
GitHub Forks
604
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
4
Stacks
121
Followers
24
Followers
123
Votes
0
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Great long tail search results
  • 1
    Fast responses to online chat
  • 1
    Facet search
  • 1
    Easy to deploy
  • 1
    Useful defaults
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Python
Python
Rust
Rust
Golang
Golang
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sonic Server, MeiliSearch?

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope