StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. MediaWiki vs WordPress

MediaWiki vs WordPress

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WordPress
WordPress
Stacks99.3K
Followers41.4K
Votes2.1K
GitHub Stars20.6K
Forks12.9K
MediaWiki
MediaWiki
Stacks178
Followers88
Votes0

MediaWiki vs WordPress: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MediaWiki and WordPress

  1. User Interface: MediaWiki is designed primarily for creating and editing collaborative content, such as wikis, and has a straightforward and uncomplicated user interface. On the other hand, WordPress is a content management system (CMS) that focuses on website development and blogging. It offers a more comprehensive set of features geared towards creating and managing websites, including customizable themes and plugins.

  2. Collaborative Editing: MediaWiki provides extensive support for collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to contribute to the same page simultaneously, with changes being tracked and easily reverted if necessary. WordPress, on the other hand, primarily focuses on individual content creation and is not specifically designed for real-time collaborative editing.

  3. Content Structure: MediaWiki organizes content hierarchically using a system of pages and categories. It allows for the creation of interconnected articles and facilitates the creation of a comprehensive knowledge base. WordPress, on the other hand, organizes content primarily through posts, pages, and taxonomies. The emphasis is more on structuring content for blog posts or traditional website pages.

  4. Permission and Access Control: MediaWiki has a robust permission management system that allows administrators to grant or restrict various actions and permissions to different user groups. WordPress also offers user roles and permissions but primarily focuses on roles for individual content creators and administrators. Advanced access control is possible with plugins but not inherent to the core system.

  5. Customization and Extensibility: WordPress provides a wide range of customizable themes and plugins, making it highly adaptable for various website purposes. Users can easily modify the appearance and functionality of their WordPress site through themes and plugins. MediaWiki, on the other hand, offers fewer customization options and may require more technical knowledge to modify the layout and functionality.

  6. Documentation and Support: As a widely used CMS, WordPress has a large and active community of users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. There are numerous resources available for troubleshooting and learning. MediaWiki also has a community but may have a more focused user base, primarily aimed at wiki-based projects.

In summary, MediaWiki is more suitable for creating collaborative content, such as wikis, while WordPress is a versatile CMS primarily focused on website development and blogging with extensive customization options and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WordPress, MediaWiki

Xander
Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k
Comments
Michael
Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceonConfluenceConfluenceGoogle DocsGoogle Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62k views62k
Comments
Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WordPress
WordPress
MediaWiki
MediaWiki

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

Flexibility;Publishing Tools;User Management;Media Management;Full Standards Compliance;Easy Theme System;Extend with Plugins;Built-in Comments;Search Engine Optimized;Multilingual;Easy Installation and Upgrades;Importers;Own Your Data
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
12.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
99.3K
Stacks
178
Followers
41.4K
Followers
88
Votes
2.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 418
    Customizable
  • 369
    Easy to manage
  • 357
    Plugins & themes
  • 259
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 248
    Really powerful
Cons
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
No community feedback yet
Integrations
ClickTale
ClickTale
Clicky
Clicky
Disqus
Disqus
Formstack
Formstack
GoSquared
GoSquared
HipChat
HipChat
Hipmob
Hipmob
KickoffLabs
KickoffLabs
KISSmetrics
KISSmetrics
LiveChat
LiveChat
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WordPress, MediaWiki?

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack