StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs NativeScript

Material UI vs NativeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
NativeScript
NativeScript
Stacks533
Followers1.1K
Votes516
GitHub Stars25.3K
Forks1.7K

Material UI vs NativeScript: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Material UI and NativeScript are popular frameworks for building user interfaces. They have their own unique features and differences that cater to different development needs.

1. **Language and Framework**: Material UI is mainly used with React, a JavaScript library, while NativeScript works with a variety of web technologies such as Angular, Vue.js, and plain JavaScript. This difference in language and framework compatibility can impact the choice for developers based on their familiarity and project requirements.

2. **Design System**: Material UI follows Google's Material Design principles, providing a consistent and visually appealing design system for web applications. On the other hand, NativeScript offers a more platform-native experience, adapting UI components to match the look and feel of the respective devices. This difference can influence the user experience and branding consistency of the final product.

3. **Cross-Platform Support**: NativeScript is known for its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to build applications for both iOS and Android using a single codebase. Material UI, on the other hand, is more focused on web development, making it less suitable for native mobile app development. This distinction can be crucial when deciding the target platforms for a project.

4. **Component Library**: Material UI provides a rich set of pre-built components that are ready to use in web applications, helping developers speed up the development process. Meanwhile, NativeScript offers a more lightweight core with the flexibility to extend functionality through plugins and custom components. This difference in component approach can impact the development workflow and customization options.

5. **Integration with Native Features**: NativeScript has strong integration with native device features and APIs, allowing developers to access platform-specific functionalities seamlessly. Material UI, being more web-oriented, may require additional plugins or workarounds to achieve similar integrations with device features. This difference is crucial for applications that heavily rely on device capabilities.

6. **Performance and Optimization**: NativeScript, being closer to the native layer, can offer better performance in terms of speed and resource utilization compared to web-based frameworks like Material UI. This difference in performance can be significant for resource-intensive applications or those requiring smooth animations and interactions.

In Summary, Material UI and NativeScript differ in language/framework compatibility, design system approach, cross-platform support, component library richness, integration with native features, and performance optimization, catering to various development needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, NativeScript

Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
NativeScript
NativeScript

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
25.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
533
Followers
3.7K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
445
Votes
516
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
Cons
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, NativeScript?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase