Material UI vs NativeBase

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

NativeBase

Stacks85

Followers273

Votes3

GitHub Stars20.4K

Forks2.4K

Material UI vs NativeBase: What are the differences?

1. Customization: Material UI provides a high level of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the styles and components according to their specific project needs. NativeBase, on the other hand, offers a limited level of customization, primarily focusing on delivering a consistent and cohesive design language.
2. Component Library: Material UI includes a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as buttons, grids, and inputs, making it easier for developers to quickly assemble user interfaces. NativeBase also offers a wide range of components, but it mainly focuses on providing components specifically designed for mobile app development.
3. Platform Compatibility: Material UI is primarily developed for web applications and is well-suited for building responsive and adaptive user interfaces that work across multiple devices and platforms. NativeBase, on the other hand, is specifically designed for mobile app development, providing native-like components and responsiveness, ensuring better performance on mobile devices.
4. Theming: Material UI offers a robust theming system, allowing developers to easily customize the overall look and feel of their applications. NativeBase also provides theming options, but they are relatively limited compared to Material UI.
5. Integration: Material UI seamlessly integrates with popular JavaScript frameworks such as React, making it easier to incorporate Material UI components into React-based applications. NativeBase is also compatible with React, but it is primarily designed for use with React Native, providing ready-to-use components for building cross-platform mobile apps.
6. Community and Support: Material UI has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven contributions. NativeBase also has a significant community, but it may not be as extensive as Material UI's. However, NativeBase has excellent support for React Native-specific features and development.

In Summary, Material UI offers extensive customization and theming options, while NativeBase focuses on delivering mobile-focused components and better integration with React Native for cross-platform mobile app development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, NativeBase

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	NativeBase
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	NativeBase is a free and open source framework that enables developers to build high-quality mobile apps using React Native iOS and Android apps with a fusion of ES6. NativeBase builds a layer on top of React Native that provides you with basic set of components for mobile application development. This helps you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 20.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.4K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 85
Followers 3.7K	Followers 273
Votes 445	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 Extra library needed for date/time pickers	Pros 3 Easy setup and use
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	React Native

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, NativeBase?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Related Comparisons

Material UI vs NativeBase: What are the differences?

1. Customization: Material UI provides a high level of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the styles and components according to their specific project needs. NativeBase, on the other hand, offers a limited level of customization, primarily focusing on delivering a consistent and cohesive design language.
2. Component Library: Material UI includes a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as buttons, grids, and inputs, making it easier for developers to quickly assemble user interfaces. NativeBase also offers a wide range of components, but it mainly focuses on providing components specifically designed for mobile app development.
3. Platform Compatibility: Material UI is primarily developed for web applications and is well-suited for building responsive and adaptive user interfaces that work across multiple devices and platforms. NativeBase, on the other hand, is specifically designed for mobile app development, providing native-like components and responsiveness, ensuring better performance on mobile devices.
4. Theming: Material UI offers a robust theming system, allowing developers to easily customize the overall look and feel of their applications. NativeBase also provides theming options, but they are relatively limited compared to Material UI.
5. Integration: Material UI seamlessly integrates with popular JavaScript frameworks such as React, making it easier to incorporate Material UI components into React-based applications. NativeBase is also compatible with React, but it is primarily designed for use with React Native, providing ready-to-use components for building cross-platform mobile apps.
6. Community and Support: Material UI has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven contributions. NativeBase also has a significant community, but it may not be as extensive as Material UI's. However, NativeBase has excellent support for React Native-specific features and development.

Material UI vs NativeBase

Overview