Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design for Angular vs tachyons: What are the differences?
Introduction
Material Design for Angular and Tachyons are both popular front-end frameworks used for designing web applications. However, they have distinct differences in terms of their design philosophy and approach to styling.
Design Principles: Material Design for Angular follows Google's Material Design principles, which emphasize tactile realism, responsive interaction, and meaningful motion. On the other hand, Tachyons focuses on functional CSS with an emphasis on utility classes for rapid prototyping.
Component Library: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive library of pre-built components such as buttons, cards, and modals that follow the Material Design guidelines. In contrast, Tachyons does not provide pre-built components but instead offers a set of utility classes for styling elements directly.
Customization Options: Material Design for Angular allows for customization of pre-built components through theming and styling options. In contrast, Tachyons promotes a more standardized approach to styling with limited customization options to maintain consistency.
Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular requires familiarity with the Material Design guidelines and Angular framework, making it more suitable for developers already comfortable with Angular. Tachyons, with its focus on atomic CSS classes, has a relatively low learning curve and is easy to implement for developers new to front-end development.
Size and Performance: Tachyons is known for its lightweight nature, with a minified CSS file size of around 14kb, promoting faster loading times and better performance. Material Design for Angular, due to its extensive component library and theming options, can result in larger CSS file sizes and potentially slower performance.
Ecosystem and Support: Material Design for Angular benefits from the larger Angular ecosystem and community support, making it easier to find resources and solutions to common issues. Tachyons, while well-documented, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and customization.
In Summary, Material Design for Angular and Tachyons differ in their design principles, component libraries, customization options, learning curve, size and performance, as well as ecosystem and support.
Pros of Material Design for Angular
- Ui components121
- Backed by google62
- Free51
- Backed by angular50
- Javascript47
- Open source34
- Responsiveness32
- Easy to learn30
- Quick to develop28
- Customizable20
- Powerful8
- Easy to start8
- Flexible6
- Themes6
- Flexbox Layouts4
- Great community3
- I like its design3
- Great extensions2
- Consistents1
- CDK1
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
Pros of tachyons
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design for Angular
- No practical examples4