Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
TestComplete vs mabl: What are the differences?
- License Model: TestComplete requires users to purchase a license for a specific number of users, while mabl offers a subscription-based pricing model on a per-user basis, making it more scalable and cost-effective for larger teams.
- Scripting Language: TestComplete supports scripting languages like JavaScript, Python, VBScript, etc., allowing more flexibility in test automation, whereas mabl's proprietary language simplifies the test creation process but may limit customization options for advanced users.
- AI-Powered Testing: Mabl utilizes machine learning and AI algorithms to auto-heal tests, detect anomalies, and recommend improvements, making it ideal for continuous testing and reducing maintenance overhead, while TestComplete relies on manual adjustments and updates by testers.
- Cloud Integration: Mabl seamlessly integrates with popular cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud for enhanced scalability and testing capabilities, enabling users to run tests across different environments effortlessly, which may require additional setup and configuration in TestComplete.
- Collaboration Features: Mabl provides built-in collaboration tools like shared dashboards, test insights, and easy sharing of test results, fostering teamwork and communication within QA teams, which may be lacking or require third-party tools in TestComplete.
In Summary, TestComplete and mabl differ in their license models, scripting languages, AI-powered testing capabilities, cloud integration, and collaboration features, catering to different needs and preferences in test automation tools.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MoreWhat is mabl?
Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.
What is TestComplete?
It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention mabl and TestComplete as a desired skillset
What companies use mabl?
What companies use TestComplete?
What companies use mabl?
What companies use TestComplete?
See which teams inside your own company are using mabl or TestComplete.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with mabl?
What tools integrate with TestComplete?
What tools integrate with TestComplete?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to mabl and TestComplete?
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Testim
It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.