Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

mabl

29
55
+ 1
0
Sauce Labs

313
434
+ 1
438
Add tool

Sauce Labs vs mabl: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of software testing, two popular tools stand out - Sauce Labs and mabl. Both tools serve the purpose of providing efficient testing solutions for various applications. However, there are key differences between the two that can help businesses make an informed decision on which tool to choose.

  1. Deployment Options: Sauce Labs offers a cloud-based solution for running tests on various browsers and devices, providing scalability and flexibility. On the other hand, mabl offers a SaaS platform that includes cloud-based deployment but also allows for on-premises deployment, giving users more control over their testing environments.

  2. AI and ML Capabilities: mabl boasts advanced AI and machine learning capabilities, allowing it to automatically adapt tests as applications change over time. In comparison, Sauce Labs primarily focuses on providing a robust testing infrastructure, but with less emphasis on AI and ML in test automation.

  3. Reporting and Metrics: Sauce Labs offers detailed reporting and insight into test results, performance metrics, and device/browser coverage. In contrast, mabl provides detailed visualizations and anomaly detection, making it easier for users to identify and address issues in their test results.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Sauce Labs offers a wide range of integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub, and Bitbucket, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. While mabl also offers integrations with various tools, its focus lies more on providing a comprehensive end-to-end testing solution within its platform.

  5. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Sauce Labs may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and configurations, making it more suitable for experienced QA professionals. On the other hand, mabl prides itself on its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use features, making it a great choice for teams looking to quickly adopt a new testing tool.

  6. Cost and Pricing Structure: Sauce Labs follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of tests run. In contrast, mabl offers a subscription-based pricing model with a focus on the number of test executions, providing more predictability in costs for users.

In Summary, the key differences between Sauce Labs and mabl lie in deployment options, AI and ML capabilities, reporting features, integration ecosystem, ease of use, and pricing structure.

Advice on mabl and Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

See more
Replies (3)
Aaron Evans
Testing Strategist at One Shore · | 3 upvotes · 7.9K views

A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.

These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.

AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.

See more
Recommends
on
BrowserStackBrowserStack

Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.

See more
Jaymie Falconi
Recommends
on
BitBarBitBar

BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of mabl
Pros of Sauce Labs
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 60
      Selenium-compatible
    • 46
      Webdriver compatible
    • 35
      Video recordings of every test
    • 31
      Qa
    • 29
      Mobile support
    • 26
      Any programming language
    • 23
      Developer tools
    • 21
      Test local and firewalled servers
    • 20
      Jenkins integration
    • 18
      Pristine VMs
    • 17
      CI Compatible
    • 11
      Appium support
    • 9
      Parallel testing
    • 8
      Rapid environment preparation
    • 8
      Mobile device support
    • 7
      Easy testing on almost any device
    • 7
      Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
    • 6
      Secure testing and easy setup
    • 5
      Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
    • 5
      Quick support response
    • 4
      Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
    • 4
      Easy to setup and understand,
    • 3
      Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
    • 3
      Maintained browser matrix
    • 3
      Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
    • 2
      Efficient tool to verify product quality
    • 2
      Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
    • 2
      Hany for platform testing
    • 2
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Generous free trial
    • 2
      Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
    • 2
      Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
    • 2
      Simplicity of Sauce-connect
    • 1
      Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
    • 1
      It's great for my QA work
    • 1
      Awesome tech support
    • 1
      Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
    • 1
      Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
    • 1
      Depth of integrations
    • 1
      Because of its cloud based support for appium
    • 1
      Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
    • 1
      QE support
    • 1
      Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
    • 1
      Secure testing
    • 1
      Cheaper than browserstack
    • 1
      Stable
    • 0
      Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of mabl
    Cons of Sauce Labs
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 2
        Relatively slow
      • 2
        Expensive

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is mabl?

      Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.

      What is Sauce Labs?

      Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use mabl?
      What companies use Sauce Labs?
      See which teams inside your own company are using mabl or Sauce Labs.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with mabl?
      What tools integrate with Sauce Labs?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to mabl and Sauce Labs?
      Selenium
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Cypress
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      Testim
      It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.
      BrowserStack
      BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
      Karma
      Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
      See all alternatives