StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. LiteSpeed vs lighttpd

LiteSpeed vs lighttpd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27
LiteSpeed
LiteSpeed
Stacks2.2K
Followers134
Votes0

LiteSpeed vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

LiteSpeed and lighttpd are both web server software that can be used to serve websites. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Performance: LiteSpeed is known for its exceptional performance and scalability. It is built with event-driven architecture, allowing it to efficiently handle a large number of concurrent connections and requests. On the other hand, lighttpd is also designed for high performance but may not match the level of scalability offered by LiteSpeed.

  2. Configuration: LiteSpeed provides a user-friendly web administration interface that allows users to easily configure and manage their web servers. It also supports Apache configuration files, making it easier for users to migrate from Apache to LiteSpeed. Lighttpd, on the other hand, has a simple and lightweight configuration system that may require more technical expertise to set up and manage.

  3. Modules and Extensions: LiteSpeed has a wide range of built-in modules and extensions that enhance its functionality, such as cache acceleration, HTTP/2 support, and security features like anti-DDoS measures. Lighttpd also has a good set of modules but may not offer the same level of feature richness as LiteSpeed.

  4. Compatibility: LiteSpeed is designed to be compatible with Apache web server configurations, making it a suitable choice for users who are already using Apache and want to switch to a more high-performance solution. Lighttpd, on the other hand, has a different configuration syntax, which may require additional effort for users to migrate from Apache or other web servers.

  5. Community and Support: LiteSpeed has a large and active community with extensive support options, including forums, documentation, and enterprise-level support for paid users. Lighttpd also has a community of users and developers, but it may not have the same level of support resources as LiteSpeed.

  6. License: LiteSpeed is a commercial product that requires a license for most production environments, including high-traffic websites. Lighttpd, on the other hand, is an open-source project released under the BSD license, making it a more cost-effective option for certain use cases.

In Summary, LiteSpeed offers superior performance, a user-friendly interface, and extensive compatibility with Apache configurations, but it is a commercial product that requires a license. Lighttpd, on the other hand, is an open-source solution with good performance and simplicity but may lack some advanced features and comprehensive support options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

lighttpd
lighttpd
LiteSpeed
LiteSpeed

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

It is a drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server. You can replace your existing Apache server with it without changing your configuration or operating system details. As a drop-in replacement, it allows you to quickly eliminate Apache bottlenecks in 15 minutes with zero downtime.

-
Event Driven Architecture; Apache Drop-In Replacement; HTTP/2 & QUIC Support; Zero Downtime Maintenance; CloudLinux Integration; Fastest PHP Available; Use with cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, CyberPanel etc; Unlimited Concurrent Connections; Mod_Security Compatible
Statistics
Stacks
156
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
133
Followers
134
Votes
27
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Simplicity
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
cPanel
cPanel
Python
Python
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Mac OS X
Mac OS X

What are some alternatives to lighttpd, LiteSpeed?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase