StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. OpenFL vs libGDX

OpenFL vs libGDX

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenFL
OpenFL
Stacks11
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks475
libGDX
libGDX
Stacks46
Followers60
Votes3
GitHub Stars24.5K
Forks6.5K

OpenFL vs libGDX: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing a framework for game development, developers often consider factors such as performance, ease of use, and community support. OpenFL and libGDX are two popular game development frameworks that offer different features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between these two frameworks can help developers make an informed decision when choosing the right tool for their projects.

  1. Language Support: OpenFL primarily uses Haxe programming language, which is known for its simplicity and flexibility. On the other hand, libGDX is based on Java, a widely-used programming language that is known for its robustness and performance. Developers familiar with Java may find libGDX easier to work with, while those looking for a more modern language may prefer Haxe with OpenFL.

  2. Platform Compatibility: OpenFL supports multiple platforms, including desktop, mobile, web, and console. This cross-platform support allows developers to create games that can run on various devices without significant changes to the code. In comparison, libGDX also offers cross-platform compatibility but is more focused on desktop and mobile platforms, with limited support for web and console.

  3. Community and Documentation: libGDX has a larger and more active community compared to OpenFL. This community support translates to more resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers using libGDX. Additionally, libGDX has comprehensive documentation that covers various aspects of game development, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot issues.

  4. Graphics and Rendering: OpenFL utilizes the GPU for rendering graphics, which can result in better performance and visual effects. In contrast, libGDX offers more control over the rendering process, allowing developers to optimize graphics for specific platforms or devices. Developers looking for advanced graphics capabilities may prefer OpenFL, while those who require fine-tuned control may lean towards libGDX.

  5. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: OpenFL is designed to be user-friendly and beginner-friendly, making it easier for new developers to start creating games. On the other hand, libGDX has a steeper learning curve, but offers more advanced features and customization options. Developers with prior game development experience may find libGDX more suitable for complex projects, while beginners may feel more comfortable starting with OpenFL.

  6. Integration with Third-Party Tools: libGDX provides seamless integration with popular third-party tools and libraries, such as Box2D for physics simulation and Ashley for entity-component systems. This integration simplifies the development process and allows developers to leverage existing resources. In comparison, OpenFL has limited support for third-party tools, which may require developers to implement custom solutions for certain functionalities.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between OpenFL and libGDX can help developers choose the right game development framework based on their project requirements, programming language preferences, and desired platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenFL
OpenFL
libGDX
libGDX

It enables creative expression for the desktop, mobile and web. Enterprise applications and best-selling games are made with it, publishing native, Flash and HTML5 applications using one seamless toolset.

The framework provides an environment for rapid prototyping and fast iterations. Instead of deploying to Android/iOS/Javascript after each code change, you can run and debug your game on the desktop, natively. Desktop JVM features like code hotswapping reduce your iteration times considerably.

Vector Graphics; Seamless support for image, canvas and typed array pixel stores;Text Support;Sound Support; Batched tile rendering; Video rendering; Asset management; MovieClip animations
Cross Platform;Open Source;Feature Packed;Well Optimized;Well Documented;Community Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Stars
24.5K
GitHub Forks
475
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
11
Stacks
46
Followers
15
Followers
60
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Fully control
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Knows exactly what happening
Cons
  • 1
    Full access to OS
  • 1
    No GUI
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
ES6
ES6
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Haxe
Haxe
Kotlin
Kotlin
Android Studio
Android Studio
Java
Java
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)

What are some alternatives to OpenFL, libGDX?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase