StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. LambdaTest vs Testim

LambdaTest vs Testim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Testim
Testim
Stacks34
Followers57
Votes0
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Stacks556
Followers198
Votes204

LambdaTest vs Testim: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software testing, LambdaTest and Testim are two popular platforms that offer a range of testing capabilities. While both serve the purpose of ensuring software quality, there are key differences that set them apart. Here, we will explore six distinct differences between LambdaTest and Testim.

  1. Testing Approach: LambdaTest provides a cloud-based testing platform that allows testers to execute their tests on different browsers, operating systems, and devices simultaneously. On the other hand, Testim focuses on providing an AI-powered test automation platform that enables testers to create, maintain, and execute their tests using a codeless approach.

  2. Code vs Codeless: LambdaTest requires testers to write their test scripts in programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, Java, etc. This provides more flexibility and control over the testing process but also demands coding skills. Contrarily, Testim allows testers to create and execute tests using its codeless testing approach, eliminating the need for coding expertise and making it suitable for non-technical users.

  3. Supported Test Types: LambdaTest primarily focuses on providing cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing testers to simulate their application on different browser and operating system combinations. Testim, on the other hand, supports a broader range of test types, including functional testing, visual testing, performance testing, and regression testing. This makes Testim a comprehensive testing solution for various testing needs.

  4. Collaboration and Reporting: LambdaTest offers features for collaborating with team members by allowing them to share test results, screenshots, notes, and even conduct live interactive testing sessions. Additionally, LambdaTest provides detailed test execution reports that help in identifying and analyzing test results. Testim also offers collaboration features, enabling testers to share test cases, test data, and test execution results with team members in real-time.

  5. Integrations and Ecosystem: LambdaTest provides extensive integrations with popular testing frameworks, issue tracking tools, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools, allowing testers to seamlessly integrate their testing workflows into their existing development ecosystems. Similarly, Testim offers integrations with various CI/CD tools, version control systems, project management tools, and even popular collaboration platforms to ensure smooth workflows.

  6. Pricing Model: LambdaTest follows a subscription-based pricing model where users pay a fixed amount based on the selected plan and the number of parallel tests run. Testim, on the other hand, follows a usage-based pricing model where users pay based on the number of test executions and/or the amount of storage used. This provides flexibility to users, especially in scenarios where the number of test executions may vary.

In summary, LambdaTest specializes in cross-browser testing, requires coding skills, and follows a fixed pricing model, while Testim offers a codeless testing approach, supports a wider range of test types, and follows a flexible pricing model based on usage.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Testim
Testim
LambdaTest
LambdaTest

It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs
Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Statistics
Stacks
34
Stacks
556
Followers
57
Followers
198
Votes
0
Votes
204
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
Cons
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
TeamCity
TeamCity
Slack
Slack
Codeship
Codeship
Trello
Trello
Jenkins
Jenkins
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
Zoho Bugtracker
Zoho Bugtracker
GitLab
GitLab
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
RSpec
RSpec
Jira
Jira
PractiTest
PractiTest
AngularJS
AngularJS
JUnit
JUnit
TestCafe
TestCafe
Appium
Appium

What are some alternatives to Testim, LambdaTest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana