LambdaTest vs mabl

Overview

LambdaTest

Stacks556

Followers198

Votes204

mabl

Stacks28

Followers55

Votes0

LambdaTest vs mabl: What are the differences?

Integration with CI/CD tools: LambdaTest offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, CircleCI, and more, allowing for automated testing across various platforms and devices. On the other hand, mabl offers integration with tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, ensuring smooth collaboration between development and testing teams.
Visual UI Testing Capabilities: LambdaTest provides comprehensive visual UI testing capabilities, allowing users to identify visual bugs across different browsers and devices. In contrast, mabl also offers visual testing features but focuses more on AI-driven test automation for improved efficiency in identifying issues.
Supported Testing Environments: LambdaTest supports a wide range of testing environments, including desktop browsers, mobile emulators, and simulators, enabling thorough cross-browser testing. In comparison, mabl primarily focuses on web application testing and may not provide as extensive support for testing across different environments.
Test Scripting Flexibility: LambdaTest allows users to write test scripts in multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, Ruby, and more, providing flexibility for teams with diverse skill sets. In contrast, mabl utilizes its proprietary scripting language, making it easier for non-technical users to create and run tests without requiring extensive coding knowledge.
Reporting and Analytics: While both platforms offer reporting and analytics features, LambdaTest provides detailed insights into test results, performance metrics, and trend analysis, facilitating data-driven decision-making. On the other hand, mabl's reporting tools focus more on actionable insights and continuous monitoring to ensure optimal application performance.
Community Support and Resources: LambdaTest boasts a vibrant community forum and extensive documentation to support users in troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Conversely, mabl offers personalized support through its customer success team and dedicated training resources, catering to individual user needs effectively.

In Summary, LambdaTest and mabl differ in integration capabilities, visual testing focus, supported testing environments, test scripting flexibility, reporting and analytics offerings, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LambdaTest	mabl
LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.	Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.
Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;	Fast easy setup; Machine driven regression testing; Auto-healing tests; Fully managed; Secure; Visual Inspection
Statistics
Stacks 556	Stacks 28
Followers 198	Followers 55
Votes 204	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Pocket friendly pricing 13 Good Performance 12 Integration with Gitlab 12 Integration with Bitbucket 12 Cross browser testing Cons 1 Steep learning curve for new users 1 Limited device support 1 Cluttered UI	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Zoho Bugtracker GitLab Katalon Studio RSpec Jira PractiTest AngularJS JUnit TestCafe Appium	Jira Bamboo GitLab Codeship Postman Travis CI Jenkins GitHub Slack Segment

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest, mabl?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

LambdaTest vs mabl: What are the differences?

Integration with CI/CD tools: LambdaTest offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, CircleCI, and more, allowing for automated testing across various platforms and devices. On the other hand, mabl offers integration with tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, ensuring smooth collaboration between development and testing teams.
Visual UI Testing Capabilities: LambdaTest provides comprehensive visual UI testing capabilities, allowing users to identify visual bugs across different browsers and devices. In contrast, mabl also offers visual testing features but focuses more on AI-driven test automation for improved efficiency in identifying issues.
Supported Testing Environments: LambdaTest supports a wide range of testing environments, including desktop browsers, mobile emulators, and simulators, enabling thorough cross-browser testing. In comparison, mabl primarily focuses on web application testing and may not provide as extensive support for testing across different environments.
Test Scripting Flexibility: LambdaTest allows users to write test scripts in multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, Ruby, and more, providing flexibility for teams with diverse skill sets. In contrast, mabl utilizes its proprietary scripting language, making it easier for non-technical users to create and run tests without requiring extensive coding knowledge.
Reporting and Analytics: While both platforms offer reporting and analytics features, LambdaTest provides detailed insights into test results, performance metrics, and trend analysis, facilitating data-driven decision-making. On the other hand, mabl's reporting tools focus more on actionable insights and continuous monitoring to ensure optimal application performance.
Community Support and Resources: LambdaTest boasts a vibrant community forum and extensive documentation to support users in troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Conversely, mabl offers personalized support through its customer success team and dedicated training resources, catering to individual user needs effectively.

LambdaTest vs mabl

Overview