Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs Packer: What are the differences?
Introduction
Kubernetes and Packer are both widely used tools in the DevOps world. While they serve different purposes, they both contribute to the automation and management of infrastructure. However, there are some key differences between the two.
Scalability: One major difference between Kubernetes and Packer is their focus on scalability. Kubernetes is primarily designed for managing containers and orchestrating their deployment, scaling, and management across a cluster of nodes. On the other hand, Packer is a tool for creating machine images or virtual machine templates. It allows you to build scalable, identical machine images for different platforms, including virtual machines, containers, and cloud providers.
Abstraction Level: Another key difference between Kubernetes and Packer is their level of abstraction. Kubernetes operates at a higher level of abstraction, providing a container orchestration platform that abstracts away the underlying infrastructure details. It focuses on managing applications running in containers. On the other hand, Packer operates at a lower level of abstraction, allowing you to define and customize machine images or templates for different platforms. It provides more control over the infrastructure stack.
Purpose: Kubernetes is primarily used for deploying and managing containerized applications at scale. It provides features like automatic scaling, service discovery, load balancing, and self-healing. Packer, on the other hand, is used for creating machine images or templates that are used as a base for deploying applications or infrastructure. It allows you to define and provision software, dependencies, and configuration as part of the image creation process.
Focus: Kubernetes focuses on container orchestration and management, providing features like pod management, service discovery, and load balancing. It simplifies the deployment and scaling of containerized applications. Packer, on the other hand, focuses on the image creation process, allowing you to define and provision the software stack, dependencies, and configurations for the image. It aims to provide a consistent base image for deployment.
Deployment Targets: Kubernetes is designed to be platform-agnostic and can be used to deploy containers across various cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure. It provides a unified API to manage the deployment and scaling of containerized applications. Packer, on the other hand, supports a wide range of deployment targets, including virtual machines, containers, and cloud platforms. It allows you to create machine images or templates that can be used on different infrastructure providers.
Workflow: The workflow of Kubernetes and Packer differs significantly. Kubernetes focuses on automating the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It provides declarative configuration files (YAML or JSON) to define the desired state of the infrastructure. Packer, on the other hand, follows an imperative workflow, where you define the steps and configurations needed to build the machine image. It supports various builders and provisioners to customize the image creation process.
In summary, Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing containerized applications at scale, while Packer is a tool for creating machine images or templates that can be used as a base for deploying applications or infrastructure. Kubernetes operates at a higher level of abstraction and provides extensive automation and management capabilities, while Packer allows for more control over the image creation process and supports various deployment targets.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful130
- Open source108
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services26
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Cheap8
- Simple8
- Self-healing7
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Custom and extensibility3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
Pros of Packer
- Cross platform builds27
- Vm creation automation8
- Bake in security4
- Easy to use1
- Good documentation1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1