1. Key Difference 1: Flexibility and Customization: One of the key differences between Kissflow and Zoho is the level of flexibility and customization they offer. Kissflow provides a highly configurable platform that allows users to customize different aspects of their workflows and processes. Users can easily design their own forms, define approval processes, and tailor the overall workflow to meet their specific needs. On the other hand, Zoho offers a more structured and predefined approach, with limited room for customization. While Zoho provides a range of pre-built applications for different business functions, the level of customization is comparatively restricted.

2. Key Difference 2: Integration Capabilities: Another significant difference between Kissflow and Zoho lies in their integration capabilities. Kissflow offers seamless integration with a wide range of third-party applications and services, allowing users to connect their workflows with various tools and platforms. This enables the exchange of data between different systems, enhances automation, and streamlines processes. Conversely, Zoho has its own suite of applications and offers integration mainly within its own ecosystem, limiting the scope of integration with external tools.

3. Key Difference 3: Deployment Options: Kissflow provides users with the flexibility to choose between cloud-based and on-premises deployment options. This implies that organizations can opt for a cloud-based solution hosted by Kissflow or choose to deploy the software on their own infrastructure. In contrast, Zoho primarily offers a cloud-based deployment model, with limited on-premises options. This difference in deployment options caters to diverse organizational preferences and requirements.

4. Key Difference 4: Pricing Model: Kissflow and Zoho differ in their pricing models. Kissflow follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or annual fee per user. The pricing is typically based on the number of users and the features required. On the other hand, Zoho offers a tiered pricing structure, wherein users can choose from different editions or packages based on their needs. The pricing for Zoho generally includes a base fee per user along with additional charges for specific modules or add-ons.

5. Key Difference 5: Extensibility and App Development: Kissflow stands out in terms of its app development capabilities and extensibility. This platform allows users to build and publish their own custom apps, extending the functionality of the core product. Users can leverage the flexible development framework provided by Kissflow to create specialized apps that cater to their unique business requirements. In contrast, Zoho offers limited options for custom app development and extensibility, primarily focusing on their existing suite of applications.

6. Key Difference 6: User Experience and Interface: Both Kissflow and Zoho offer user-friendly interfaces; however, there are differences in their user experience design. Kissflow provides a more modern and visually appealing interface, with intuitive navigation and a minimalist design. The platform emphasizes simplicity and ease-of-use, enabling users to quickly familiarize themselves with the system. Zoho, on the other hand, offers a slightly more traditional interface with a comprehensive set of features and functionalities. While still user-friendly, Zoho's interface may require some learning curve for new users.

In Summary, Kissflow and Zoho differ in terms of flexibility and customization, integration capabilities, deployment options, pricing models, app development capabilities, and user experience. Kissflow provides a highly customizable platform with seamless integration options, various deployment choices, a subscription-based pricing model, extensive app development capabilities, and a modern interface. On the other hand, Zoho offers a more structured approach with limited customization, integration mainly within its ecosystem, primarily cloud-based deployment options, tiered pricing, limited app development options, and a comprehensive yet slightly traditional user interface.