Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

jFrog

126
103
+ 1
0
Red Hat OpenShift

1.5K
1.4K
+ 1
517
Add tool

OpenShift vs jFrog: What are the differences?

Key Differences between OpenShift and jFrog

OpenShift and jFrog are two popular platforms used in software development and deployment. While they both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Deployment Strategy: One of the main differences between OpenShift and jFrog is their deployment strategy. OpenShift is a container management platform that focuses on managing and orchestrating containerized applications using Kubernetes, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. On the other hand, jFrog is a universal artifact repository manager that handles the storage and distribution of software binaries, making it ideal for managing software artifacts throughout the development lifecycle.

  2. Functionality: OpenShift offers a comprehensive set of tools and features that support the entire application lifecycle, including application building, container orchestration, and deployment. It provides a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) approach, where developers can focus on coding while OpenShift handles the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, jFrog is more focused on managing software artifacts, providing features like version control, dependency management, and artifact distribution, making it a popular choice for organizations practicing DevOps.

  3. Integration: OpenShift integrates seamlessly with various development and automation tools, including Jenkins, Git, and Docker, allowing for streamlined development and deployment workflows. It provides built-in CI/CD capabilities, enabling continuous integration and delivery. On the other hand, jFrog integrates with popular build tools, package managers, and CI/CD servers, allowing for easy integration into existing development workflows.

  4. Scalability: OpenShift is designed to handle large-scale deployments and can scale horizontally by adding more compute resources. It provides features like auto-scaling and load balancing to ensure high availability and performance. With jFrog, scalability is mainly focused on managing the storage and distribution of software artifacts rather than scaling the underlying infrastructure.

  5. Cost: OpenShift is an enterprise-grade platform that comes with licensing costs, especially for commercial deployments. It requires infrastructure resources for running the OpenShift cluster, which can add to the overall cost. On the other hand, jFrog offers a range of pricing options, including free and commercial versions, making it more cost-effective for smaller development teams or organizations with budget constraints.

  6. Community and Support: OpenShift has a large and active community, with continuous development and support from Red Hat, a leading open-source software company. It provides extensive documentation, forums, and developer resources, ensuring reliable support and troubleshooting. While jFrog also has a supportive community, its level of community engagement might be relatively lesser compared to OpenShift.

In summary, OpenShift is a container management platform focused on managing and orchestrating containerized applications, while jFrog is a universal artifact repository manager primarily used for managing software artifacts. OpenShift offers a comprehensive platform-as-a-service solution, integrates with various tools, and is designed for large-scale deployments. On the other hand, jFrog focuses on managing and distributing software artifacts, offers flexible pricing options, and has a growing community.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of jFrog
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 99
      Good free plan
    • 63
      Open Source
    • 47
      Easy setup
    • 43
      Nodejs support
    • 42
      Well documented
    • 32
      Custom domains
    • 28
      Mongodb support
    • 27
      Clean and simple architecture
    • 25
      PHP support
    • 21
      Customizable environments
    • 11
      Ability to run CRON jobs
    • 9
      Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog
    • 8
      Easy deployment
    • 7
      PostgreSQL support
    • 7
      Autoscaling
    • 7
      Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility
    • 5
      Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear
    • 4
      Shell access to gears
    • 3
      Great Support
    • 3
      High Security
    • 3
      Logging & Metrics
    • 2
      Cloud Agnostic
    • 2
      Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure
    • 2
      No credit card needed
    • 2
      Because it is easy to manage
    • 2
      Secure
    • 2
      Meteor support
    • 2
      Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e
    • 2
      Golang support
    • 2
      Its free and offer custom domain usage
    • 1
      Autoscaling at a good price point
    • 1
      Easy setup and great customer support
    • 1
      MultiCloud
    • 1
      Great free plan with excellent support
    • 1
      This is the only free one among the three as of today

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of jFrog
    Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 2
        Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
      • 2
        License cost
      • 1
        Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is jFrog?

      Host, manage and proxy artifacts using the best Docker Registry, Maven Repository, Gradle repository, NuGet repository, Ruby repository, Debian repository npm repository, Yum repository.

      What is Red Hat OpenShift?

      OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use jFrog?
      What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
      See which teams inside your own company are using jFrog or Red Hat OpenShift.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with jFrog?
      What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      PythonDockerKubernetes+14
      12
      2620
      Node.jsnpmKubernetes+6
      1
      1446
      What are some alternatives to jFrog and Red Hat OpenShift?
      Apache Maven
      Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
      JFrog Artifactory
      It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
      Jenkins
      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
      GitHub
      GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
      GitLab
      GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
      See all alternatives