StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Jetpack vs SiteLock

Jetpack vs SiteLock

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SiteLock
SiteLock
Stacks2
Followers9
Votes0
Jetpack
Jetpack
Stacks79
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks29

Jetpack vs SiteLock: What are the differences?

Introduction Website security is a crucial aspect in today's digital world. Two popular options for ensuring website security are Jetpack and SiteLock. While both offer security solutions, there are key differences between the two that should be considered. The following are the main differences between Jetpack and SiteLock:

  1. Pricing Models: Jetpack offers a freemium pricing model, with a range of free and premium features, allowing users to choose the level of security they require. SiteLock, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model, with different tiers for different levels of website security. This difference in pricing models allows users to opt for a solution that best fits their budget and security needs.

  2. Scope of Protection: Jetpack is primarily known for its features related to WordPress websites, providing security measures such as brute force attack protection, downtime monitoring, and spam filtering. SiteLock, on the other hand, offers a wider range of security services beyond just WordPress, including web application firewall, malware detection, and removal, and vulnerability scanning. SiteLock's broader scope of protection makes it suitable for those who require comprehensive security for various types of websites.

  3. Scanning and Monitoring: Jetpack offers security features such as automated scanning for malware and threats, as well as real-time activity monitoring. It also includes automated backups and easy restoration options. SiteLock, on the other hand, offers advanced scanning and monitoring features, including daily malware scanning, blacklist monitoring, and vulnerability detection. SiteLock's comprehensive scanning and monitoring capabilities make it a preferred choice for those who prioritize proactive security measures.

  4. Customer Support: Jetpack provides customer support through a ticket-based system, offering technical assistance and guidance for users. SiteLock, on the other hand, offers 24/7 customer support, including phone, chat, and email support. SiteLock's extensive customer support options ensure that users have access to assistance whenever required, which can be a crucial factor when dealing with potential security breaches.

  5. Additional Features: Alongside security features, Jetpack also offers various additional features for WordPress websites, such as site analytics, content tools, and social media integration. SiteLock, on the other hand, primarily focuses on security-related services and does not provide extensive additional features beyond website security. This difference in additional features makes Jetpack a comprehensive solution for overall website management, while SiteLock focuses solely on security aspects.

  6. Integration with Hosting Providers: Jetpack is particularly designed for WordPress websites and is often bundled with hosting plans offered by WordPress focused hosts. This integration allows for easier setup and management of security features. SiteLock, on the other hand, can be integrated with various hosting providers, regardless of the website platform, offering flexibility for users who have websites hosted on different platforms.

In summary, Jetpack and SiteLock differ in pricing models, scope of protection, scanning and monitoring capabilities, customer support, additional features, and integration with hosting providers. Jetpack offers a freemium model, primarily focusing on WordPress websites, with a range of security features and additional tools, while SiteLock follows a subscription-based model, offering a broader range of security services beyond WordPress. SiteLock provides comprehensive security features, advanced scanning, and 24/7 customer support, making it suitable for those who require extensive protection and assistance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SiteLock
SiteLock
Jetpack
Jetpack

It is a service that performs daily scans of a website to identify vulnerabilities and protect against threats like viruses, cross-site scripting, SQL injection and even email blacklisting

Jetpack wraps webpack to create a smoother developer experience. Jetpack can be used instead of webpack, webpack-cli, webpack-dev-server and webpack-dev-middleware without writing any configuration. Jetpack is a thin wrapper around webpack, and can be extended with any of the webpack configuration.

XSS Scripting; SQL Injection; App Scanning.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29
Stacks
2
Stacks
79
Followers
9
Followers
43
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Cloudflare Spectrum
Cloudflare Spectrum
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
IBM Containers
IBM Containers
WordPress
WordPress
Traefik
Traefik
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
Babel
Babel
Webpack
Webpack
PostCSS
PostCSS

What are some alternatives to SiteLock, Jetpack?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp