Ionic vs Material Design for Bootstrap: What are the differences?
Ionic belongs to "Cross-Platform Mobile Development" category of the tech stack, while Material Design for Bootstrap can be primarily classified under "Front-End Frameworks".
Some of the features offered by Ionic are:
- Performance obsessed
- Utilizes Angular and React
- Native focused
On the other hand, Material Design for Bootstrap provides the following key features:
- Input fields (text, numeric, email, etc)
- Buttons (ripple effect working)
"Allows for rapid prototyping" is the primary reason why developers consider Ionic over the competitors, whereas "Bootstrap" was stated as the key factor in picking Material Design for Bootstrap.
Ionic and Material Design for Bootstrap are both open source tools. It seems that Ionic with 38.4K GitHub stars and 13.1K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Material Design for Bootstrap with 19.9K GitHub stars and 3.31K GitHub forks.
Sellsuki, Edify, and eTobb are some of the popular companies that use Ionic, whereas Material Design for Bootstrap is used by MXD3D, Itbid, and TypeLead. Ionic has a broader approval, being mentioned in 392 company stacks & 350 developers stacks; compared to Material Design for Bootstrap, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
- Easy to learn & deployed production
- Fast development
- Strong community
- Completed Documents
- Native performance with lower RAM used.
- Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
- Powered by Facebook.