IFTTT vs Postman

Overview

IFTTT

Stacks298

Followers289

Votes72

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

IFTTT vs Postman: What are the differences?

Usage: IFTTT is primarily used for automating tasks and creating simple connections between different apps and services without the need for coding. On the other hand, Postman is an API testing tool that allows developers to test APIs by sending requests, examining responses, and debugging in a collaborative environment.
Target Audience: IFTTT is designed for the general public and users who are not necessarily developers, making it user-friendly and accessible to a wide range of individuals. Postman targets developers and technical professionals who have a deeper understanding of APIs and need advanced testing capabilities.
Functionality: IFTTT focuses on integrating different apps and devices to create automated workflows based on trigger actions, making it suitable for home automation and personal productivity. Postman, on the other hand, is geared towards API development and testing, providing robust features for creating and monitoring API requests and responses.
Collaboration: Postman offers features for team collaboration, such as shared workspaces and version control, enabling multiple team members to work on APIs simultaneously. IFTTT, on the other hand, is more geared towards individual use and does not provide extensive collaboration tools.
Integration: IFTTT supports a wide range of apps and services for creating connections, while Postman is focused on API testing and integrations, allowing developers to work with APIs from various platforms.
Customization: Postman allows users to create and run custom scripts for automated testing and workflows, providing more flexibility and control over the testing process compared to IFTTT, which relies on pre-built applets for automation.

In Summary, understanding the differences between IFTTT and Postman is essential for choosing the right tool based on your requirements and technical expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on IFTTT, Postman

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

IFTTT	Postman
It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.	It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Solutions by industry; Built for creators and makers; Customize with queries and code	Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Statistics
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 298	Stacks 96.1K
Followers 289	Followers 82.5K
Votes 72	Votes 1.8K
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Lots of integrations 17 Free 12 Automates manual tasks 11 Life automation 7 Internet of things	Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive
Integrations
No integrations available	HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps

What are some alternatives to IFTTT, Postman?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

Related Comparisons

IFTTT vs Postman: What are the differences?

Usage: IFTTT is primarily used for automating tasks and creating simple connections between different apps and services without the need for coding. On the other hand, Postman is an API testing tool that allows developers to test APIs by sending requests, examining responses, and debugging in a collaborative environment.
Target Audience: IFTTT is designed for the general public and users who are not necessarily developers, making it user-friendly and accessible to a wide range of individuals. Postman targets developers and technical professionals who have a deeper understanding of APIs and need advanced testing capabilities.
Functionality: IFTTT focuses on integrating different apps and devices to create automated workflows based on trigger actions, making it suitable for home automation and personal productivity. Postman, on the other hand, is geared towards API development and testing, providing robust features for creating and monitoring API requests and responses.
Collaboration: Postman offers features for team collaboration, such as shared workspaces and version control, enabling multiple team members to work on APIs simultaneously. IFTTT, on the other hand, is more geared towards individual use and does not provide extensive collaboration tools.
Integration: IFTTT supports a wide range of apps and services for creating connections, while Postman is focused on API testing and integrations, allowing developers to work with APIs from various platforms.
Customization: Postman allows users to create and run custom scripts for automated testing and workflows, providing more flexibility and control over the testing process compared to IFTTT, which relies on pre-built applets for automation.

In Summary, understanding the differences between IFTTT and Postman is essential for choosing the right tool based on your requirements and technical expertise.

IFTTT vs Postman

Overview