StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Heroku Postgres vs Kafka

Heroku Postgres vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
Heroku Postgres
Heroku Postgres
Stacks607
Followers314
Votes38

Heroku Postgres vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Heroku Postgres and Kafka, highlighting their key differences. Both Heroku Postgres and Kafka are popular technologies used for data management and processing, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart.

  1. Data Storage and Retrieval:

Heroku Postgres is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that provides a structured way to store and retrieve data. It uses SQL for querying and allows for the organization of data into tables with defined schemas. It supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, ensuring data integrity and reliability.

On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that focuses on real-time data streaming and event-driven architectures. It provides a publish-subscribe model, enabling high-throughput and fault-tolerant data streams. Kafka is optimized for handling massive amounts of data and uses a log-based storage system for efficient data retrieval.

  1. Data Processing Paradigm:

Heroku Postgres follows a traditional batch-oriented approach to data processing. It is well-suited for transactional processing and analytical queries. The data is typically processed in small batches or individually.

Kafka, on the other hand, is designed for continuous or real-time data processing. It follows a stream processing paradigm, where the data is processed in a continuous flow as it arrives. This allows for real-time analytics, event-driven processing, and integration with various applications.

  1. Data Persistence and Durability:

Heroku Postgres ensures data persistence through its transaction log and built-in replication mechanisms. It provides options for backup and recovery, allowing data to be restored in case of failures. It offers high data durability and consistency.

Kafka also provides data persistence, but it relies on disk-based storage to maintain data durability. It uses a combination of replication and distributed commit logs to ensure fault-tolerance and data resilience.

  1. Communication and Integration:

Heroku Postgres allows for seamless integration with various programming languages and frameworks through its SQL-based communication interface. It supports industry-standard protocols and can be easily integrated into existing applications.

Kafka, on the other hand, provides a messaging system that allows for asynchronous and decoupled communication between different applications and systems. It supports various messaging protocols and provides high-throughput data streaming.

  1. Data Scalability and Performance:

Heroku Postgres allows for horizontal scaling by adding more replicas to handle increased load. It provides high-performance query processing and supports indexing to improve query speeds.

Kafka is designed for high scalability and can handle a massive volume of data. It provides parallel processing capabilities, allowing for increased throughput and performance. Kafka's distributed nature makes it suitable for handling large-scale data streams.

  1. Use Cases:

Heroku Postgres is commonly used for web and mobile applications, content management systems, and any applications that require structured storage and transactional processing. It is suitable for data storage and retrieval in a traditional RDBMS environment.

Kafka is widely used in event-driven architectures, real-time streaming analytics, log processing, data pipelines, and messaging systems. It excels in scenarios where real-time data processing and stream processing are critical.

In Summary, Heroku Postgres is a relational database management system optimized for structured data storage and retrieval, while Kafka is a distributed streaming platform designed for real-time data streaming, event-driven processing, and high-throughput data pipelines.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, Heroku Postgres

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.8k views10.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
Heroku Postgres
Heroku Postgres

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Heroku Postgres provides a SQL database-as-a-service that lets you focus on building your application instead of messing around with database management.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
High Availability;Rollback;Dataclips;Automated Health Checks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
607
Followers
22.3K
Followers
314
Votes
607
Votes
38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Pros
  • 29
    Easy to setup
  • 3
    Dataclips for sharing queries
  • 3
    Follower databases
  • 3
    Extremely reliable
Cons
  • 2
    Super expensive
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Heroku
Heroku

What are some alternatives to Kafka, Heroku Postgres?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

Amazon RDS manages complex and time-consuming administrative tasks such as PostgreSQL software installation and upgrades, storage management, replication for high availability and back-ups for disaster recovery. With just a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can deploy a PostgreSQL database with automatically configured database parameters for optimal performance. Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL database instances can be provisioned with either standard storage or Provisioned IOPS storage. Once provisioned, you can scale from 10GB to 3TB of storage and from 1,000 IOPS to 30,000 IOPS.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase