StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Heroku CI vs Jenkins X

Heroku CI vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku CI
Heroku CI
Stacks90
Followers132
Votes5
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

Heroku CI vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Heroku CI and Jenkins X

<Provide a brief introduction here>

1. **Execution Environment**: Heroku CI runs tests in a disposable test environment while Jenkins X creates a Kubernetes pod for each test run, giving more flexibility in managing dependencies and configurations.
2. **Integration with Git Repositories**: Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku pipelines and Git repositories, while Jenkins X offers support for multiple source code management systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, enabling more versatile usage.
3. **Pipeline Automation**: Heroku CI focuses on simplifying the CI/CD process by automating builds and deployments, whereas Jenkins X provides more advanced pipeline automation capabilities with support for custom workflows and plugins.
4. **Scalability**: Jenkins X is designed to handle larger and more complex projects with built-in scalability features for distributed builds and deployments, while Heroku CI may have limitations in scaling for enterprise-level applications.
5. **Community Support**: Jenkins X has a dedicated and active open-source community that regularly contributes to its development and provides support, while Heroku CI's support mainly comes from the Heroku platform team.
6. **Container Orchestration**: Jenkins X is specifically designed for managing containerized applications and supports container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, whereas Heroku CI is more focused on managing applications deployed on the Heroku platform.

In Summary, Heroku CI and Jenkins X differ in their execution environments, integration with Git repositories, pipeline automation, scalability, community support, and container orchestration abilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Heroku CI, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Heroku CI
Heroku CI
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

On every push to GitHub, Heroku CI runs your tests in a disposable Heroku app, so there’s never a wait time for a free CI worker. Tests run fast, on Performance dynos.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

-
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
90
Stacks
147
Followers
132
Followers
370
Votes
5
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No waiting in the queue
  • 1
    Consolidated Heroku billing
  • 1
    Best in class pipeline integration
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Heroku CI, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana